News
QNT Technical Analysis February 28, 2026: Market Structure
QNT market structure maintains the downtrend with LH/LL, $64.31 BOS is critical for bullish reversal. BTC decline increases pressure on altcoins, bearish accelerates below $61.60.
The Promoting Innovation in Blockchain Development Act Gets Introduced in Congress
Representatives Scott Fitzgerald, Ben Cline, and Zoe Lofgren introduced the bill to Congress on February 26, seeking to protect software developers who write blockchain applications that don’t handle custody of funds from legal actions and criminal prosecution under Section 1960, Title 8. Promoting Innovation in Blockchain Development Act Introduced In Congress With Bipartisan Support The
ALGO Technical Analysis February 28, 2026: Volume and Accumulation
ALGO volume at low levels; despite the price drop, selling pressure is weak, signaling accumulation. Even as market participation decreases, divergences carry reversal potential.
Bitcoin shorts are stacking! Is the CLARITY deadline about to crash the market?
Inside Jane Street’s playbook - Extreme Bitcoin shorts don’t always signal a squeeze!
Solana’s Next Major Support Levels Sit At $50, $22, And $10: Analyst
An analyst has pointed out where Solana support levels could lie based on a Parallel Channel forming in the asset’s weekly price chart. Solana Parallel Channel Could Indicate Support At These Levels In a new post on X, analyst Ali Martinez has discussed how support is looking for Solana from the perspective of a Parallel Channel that may be emerging in its 7-day price. Related Reading: XRP Triangle Could Point To Support Between $0.60 And $0.90 The “Parallel Channel” is a pattern from technical analysis (TA) that forms whenever an asset trades between two parallel trendlines. There are a few different ways a Parallel Channel can be categorized based on the orientation of its trendlines. Ascending Channels involve lines that are pointing up, while Descending Channels have a downward slope. These types correspond to periods of parallel consolidation to a net upside and downside, respectively. In the context of the current topic, the third and the most basic type is of interest: a Parallel Channel that’s parallel to the time-axis. As the price moves inside such a channel, it observes a phase of perfectly sideways action. Now, here is the chart shared by Martinez that shows the Parallel Channel that the weekly price of Solana has potentially been moving inside in recent years: As displayed in the above graph, Solana retested the upper level of the Parallel Channel a couple of times during 2025. Each time, the price ended up topping out and a decline followed. The upper line of a Parallel Channel is considered to be a source of resistance, so these rejections may have been signs of the pattern being in action. Since the latest rejection, SOL has been moving down in a sharp manner as the cryptocurrency sector as a whole has observed a bearish shift. So far, the coin is still contained inside the upper half of the channel, but if momentum weakens, it might end up traveling lower. According to the analyst, these levels could act as support in such a scenario: $50.22, $22.47, and $9.98. These levels correspond to a point 50%, 75%, and 100% down the channel, respectively. Solana last tested the lower-most of these levels during the bear market of the previous cycle. Back then, it had helped the cryptocurrency reach a bottom. It now remains to be seen which direction the asset will go next and if a retest of any of these levels will take place. Related Reading: Ethereum Still Undervalued As Bitcoin, XRP Sit Near Neutral, Santiment Says SOL isn’t the only cryptocurrency observing a Parallel Channel setup. As Martinez has highlighted in another X post, the monthly price of Stellar (XLM) has also been moving down such a pattern, with possible support levels existing at 0.147, 0.078, and 0.041. SOL Price At the time of writing, SOL is floating around $81, down 5.5% in the last 24 hours. Featured image from Dall-E, chart from TradingView.com
ARB Technical Analysis February 28, 2026: Market Structure
ARB market structure in LH/LL downtrend; swing support test at $0.10 is critical. Bearish BOS below $0.0973 targets $0.0496, while bullish CHoCH requires a close above $0.1079.
RENDER Technical Analysis February 28, 2026: Market Structure
RENDER market structure is preserving the LH/LL downtrend, BOS above $1.4985 is a condition for bullish shift. Break below $1.3886 brings bearish continuation, increasing BTC downtrend risk.
US Pentagon chief orders Anthropic retaliation designation and lays out the ban
Anthropic is now tagged as a Supply-Chain Risk to National Security by the Department of War, according to U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, who posted a long statement on X targeting the AI company. Pete said his department is permanently breaking up with Anthropic, adhering to President Donald Trump’s public demanda that all federal government agencies stop using Anthropic’s tech “immediately.” As Cryptopolitan previously reported, Anthropic wanted two limits on how its AI gets used, saying no fully autonomous weapons and no mass domestic surveillance of Americans. US Pentagon chief orders Anthropic retaliation designation and lays out the ban Pete wrote in his X post that the Department of War simply had “have full, unrestricted access” to Anthropic models for “every LAWFUL purpose.” He also attacked Dario Amodei, Anthropic’s CEO, and said the company used “effective altruism” language while trying to force the military’s hand. Pete then said that the company’s “true objective” was “to seize veto power over the operational decisions of the United States military.” The US defense chief then wrote that Anthropic is “fundamentally incompatible with American principles,” and said its relationship with the U.S. Armed Forces and the federal government had been “permanently altered.” Pete wrote that:- “In conjunction with the President’s directive for the Federal Government to cease all use of Anthropic’s technology, I am directing the Department of War to designate Anthropic a Supply-Chain Risk to National Security. Effective immediately, no contractor, supplier, or partner that does business with the United States military may conduct any commercial activity with Anthropic.” Pete also added a transition window, saying that Anthropic will keep providing services to the Department of War “for a period of no more than six months” so the Pentagon can switch to something else. He ended with, “This decision is final.” The deadline passes after the $200 million deal Anthropic had signed a $200 million contract with the Pentagon in July. After that deal, Anthropic wanted written assurances that its models would not be used in fully autonomous weapons or mass domestic surveillance of Americans. The notes say the Pentagon “strongly resisted” that request. Then the Pentagon set a deadline: 5:01 p.m. ET Friday. The demand was that Anthropic agree that the U.S. military can use the tech for “all lawful purposes.” Obviously, that deadline passed without an agreement. The Pentagon’s contractor web includes every kind of compny, including every operating system vendor, every hardware maker, every hyperscaler, and every supplier in the chain. The Trump administration’s actions is a twisted power grab over its inability to commit war crimes and stalk its own citizens. Anthropic responds to Pentagon, cites 10 USC 3252, and talks court Anthropic responded with its own statement. The company said it had not received direct communication from the Department of War or the White House on the status of negotiations. It said, “We have tried in good faith to reach an agreement,” and said it supports lawful uses for national security. On the label itself, Anthropic called the designation “unprecedented,” and said it is usually reserved for U.S. adversaries and has never been publicly applied to an American company. It said, “We are deeply saddened by these developments.” Anthropic also pointed to its past work with the military. It said it was the first frontier AI company to deploy models in U.S. government classified networks, that it has supported American warfighters since June 2024, and that it intends to keep doing so. The company then said the designation would be “legally unsound” and would set a “dangerous precedent” for any American company that negotiates with the government. It said: “No amount of intimidation or punishment from the Department of War will change our position on mass domestic surveillance or fully autonomous weapons. We will challenge any supply chain risk designation in court.” Anthropic then said Pete implied the label would stop anyone who does business with the military from doing business with Anthropic, and it said Pete “does not have the statutory authority” to back that up. It cited 10 USC 3252 and said a supply chain risk designation can only extend to the use of Claude as part of Department of War contracts, but cannot control how contractors use Claude for other customers. The company has promised that individual customers and commercial contract customers are unaffected, including access to Claude through the API, claude.ai, and other products. It said Department of War contractors would only be restricted on Department of War contract work, if the designation is formally adopted, and use for any other purpose would be unaffected. Meanwhile, Big Tech companies Nvidia, Amazon, and Google would likely have to divest from Anthropic if Pete gets his way, which would also make it nearly impossible to recommend investing in American AI to any investor, or starting an AI company in the United States. This is essentially a lose-lose. Join a premium crypto trading community free for 30 days - normally $100/mo.
Mt. Gox Former CEO's 80,000 BTC Recovery Call
Mt. Gox former CEO Karpelès proposed a hard fork to recover 79.956 BTC. 15+ year dormant UTXOs sparked debate. Community criticisms are harsh, BTC in downtrend at 65.679 USD. Trustee distributions ...
7 Top Altcoins for 2026: APEMARS Stage 9 Presale Leads as High ROI Crypto Investment – 6,900% ROI Ending Soon
The crypto market is attracting huge attention! With coins like Apeing, Bitcoin Cash, Chainlink, Sui, Monero, and World Liberty Financial showing strong growth, investors are hunting for the high ROI crypto investment that can skyrocket their portfolio. Among the top altcoins for 2026 , emerging projects like APEMARS ($APRZ) stand out, now entering their presale stage, offering early adopters a unique chance to maximize returns and get ahead in the market. Now is the perfect time to explore the most promising altcoins for 2026. While Bitcoin Cash and Chainlink continue showing strong fundamentals, Apemars ($APRZ) offers an unprecedented presale opportunity. This is the chance to get in early, maximize returns, and set yourself up for serious financial growth with one of the most talked-about crypto projects this year. 1. APEMARS ($APRZ): The High ROI Crypto Investment Everyone Is Talking About APEMARS ($APRZ) presale is live at Stage 9 (Dust Swipe), priced at $0.00007841. With a listing price of $0.0055, early investors could see a potential ROI of 6,900%! Over 1,220 holders have already joined, raising more than $259K by selling 12.03B tokens. This makes APEMARS ($APRZ) a standout high ROI crypto investment for 2026, offering early adopters a unique chance to grow their portfolio while participating in one of the most exciting presales this year. The APE Yield Station staking system lets investors earn passive income with 63% APY, inspired by Mars’ –63°C temperature. Rewards are allocated from 20% of the token supply, with a 2-month mandatory lock to stabilize early trading. All rewards auto-accumulate and can be claimed after the lock ends. This combination of presale access and staking potential makes APEMARS ($APRZ) an irresistible opportunity for both short-term gains and long-term growth. Investment Scenario: Transform $1,000 Into A Mars-Sized ROI Imagine investing $1,000 in APEMARS ($APRZ) today at Stage 9. By the listing price, your investment could skyrocket to $69,000! That could pay off loans, fund a dream vacation, or jumpstart your own business. Early adopters enjoy the exclusivity and rewards of this presale stage, putting them ahead of the crypto crowd. This is your “now or never” moment. How To Buy APEMARS ($APRZ) Visit the official APEMARS presale page. Connect your wallet (MetaMask, Trust Wallet, etc.). Select your purchase amount at the Stage 9 price. Confirm the transaction and secure your tokens. 2. Apeing – The Trendy Altcoin Everyone Loves Apeing continues to capture investor attention through its strong and active community. Its unique approach to NFTs and gamified features has created a loyal following, helping maintain steady growth and market interest. The coin’s adoption is expanding as more platforms integrate its token for digital collectibles and interactive experiences. This growing ecosystem positions Apeing as a potential long-term player in the NFT and crypto space. 3. Bitcoin Cash – The Classic Powerhouse Bitcoin Cash remains a favorite for secure, fast, and low-fee transactions. Its strong reputation and wide acceptance in crypto commerce make it a reliable choice for both new and seasoned investors. Continuous development updates and community-driven governance ensure Bitcoin Cash maintains stability and adaptability. Its combination of speed and trustworthiness makes it a cornerstone in diversified crypto portfolios. 4. Chainlink – Oracles That Drive DeFi Chainlink bridges blockchain technology with real-world data, enabling smart contracts to interact with external systems. Its role as a trusted oracle service has made it integral to the growth of decentralized finance (DeFi). Investors and developers value Chainlink for its reliability and integration potential. As DeFi platforms expand, Chainlink’s network continues to grow, reinforcing its utility and long-term relevance. 5. Sui – The Layer-1 That’s Rising Sui has gained attention for its scalability, speed, and innovative consensus mechanism. The platform is designed to handle high transaction throughput, attracting developers looking for efficiency and performance. With increasing adoption and growing interest in Layer-1 solutions, Sui shows promise as a platform for next-generation decentralized applications, combining technical strength with emerging use cases. 6. Monero – Privacy Is Power Monero is recognized as the leading privacy-focused cryptocurrency. Its advanced cryptography ensures anonymous transactions, appealing to users who value financial privacy and security. Ongoing development and community support maintain Monero’s robustness and reliability. Its consistent focus on anonymity and decentralization reinforces its position as a key player in the privacy coin sector. 7. World Liberty Financial – Finance Reimagined World Liberty Financial is gaining recognition for innovative solutions in the decentralized finance space. Its transparent protocols and user-focused design have attracted growing interest from investors. The platform’s expanding ecosystem highlights its potential for scalability and adoption. By offering efficient financial services, World Liberty Financial continues to establish itself as a credible and forward-thinking DeFi project. Conclusion Coins like APEMARS ($APRZ), Apeing, Bitcoin Cash, Chainlink, Sui, Monero, and World Liberty Financial are shaping the crypto landscape of 2026, but for investors seeking high ROI opportunities, early-stage projects like APEMARS stand out. Timing and smart selection are key, and getting in during the presale phase can position investors to maximize potential gains in this rapidly evolving market. Among emerging projects, APEMARS ($APRZ) presale stands out as the best crypto to buy now , offering early adopters a unique chance to grow their portfolio significantly. Don’t wait, securing your tokens today could set you ahead in the market and open doors to long-term financial growth. For More Information: Website: Visit the Official APEMARS Website Telegram: Join the APEMARS Telegram Channel Twitter: Follow APEMARS ON X (Formerly Twitter) Frequently Asked Questions About the Top Altcoins For 2026 What Makes APEMARS ($APRZ) a High ROI Crypto Investment? APEMARS presale offers Stage 9 tokens at $0.00007841, listing at $0.0055, yielding 6,900% potential returns for early adopters. How Can I Stake APEMARS Tokens? Use the APE Yield Station to stake with 63% APY. Rewards auto-accumulate and unlock after a 2-month lock. When Does the APEMARS Presale End? The presale continues until tokens are sold out or the next stage begins, so act fast for maximum returns. Are Other Altcoins Like Sui Or Chainlink Still Worth Buying? Yes, they offer long-term stability and growth, but APEMARS ($APRZ) presale maximizes early ROI potential. How Many Tokens Have Been Sold So Far? Over 12.03B tokens sold, with 1,220+ holders raising $259k+ in the presale. Summary Of The Article This article discussed APEMARS ($APRZ) presale, Apeing, Bitcoin Cash, Chainlink, Sui, Monero, and World Liberty Financial. We explained ROI potential, staking, purchase methods, and investment scenarios. APEMARS ($APRZ) presale is the must-buy high ROI crypto investment for 2026. Disclaimer: This is a sponsored press release for informational purposes only. It does not reflect the views of Times Tabloid, nor is it intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, or financial advice. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses. The post 7 Top Altcoins for 2026: APEMARS Stage 9 Presale Leads as High ROI Crypto Investment – 6,900% ROI Ending Soon appeared first on Times Tabloid .
KAS Technical Analysis February 28, 2026: Volume and Accumulation
KAS volume remains below recent averages, indicating that the decline lacks conviction; accumulation signs are becoming apparent. Market participation is low, and the price-volume divergence carrie...
Hyperliquid (HYPE) Eyes Native Token Issuance With Latest Upgrade Plan
Hyperliquid (HYPE), one of the largest decentralized exchanges (DEXs) in the crypto sector, is preparing a significant upgrade that could reshape how new projects launch tokens on its platform. The proposal, known as HIP-6, introduces a framework designed to enable permissionless, on-chain token launches without relying on the off‑chain capital-raising methods that many teams currently use. New Hyperliquid Proposal Details of the proposal were shared on social media by James Evans of Reciprocal Ventures. According to Evans, HIP-6 establishes a permissionless token launch auction for new HIP-1 assets, specifically tailored for teams seeking to issue tokens directly on Hyperliquid. The system adapts Uniswap’s continuous clearing auction model to function within Hyperliquid’s central limit order book (CLOB) environment, allowing token launches to occur natively within the exchange’s infrastructure. Related Reading: Jane Street Faces New Lawsuit: Trump Media Calls For Federal Investigation At present, while HIP-1 and HIP-2 already allow permissionless token deployment and automated liquidity provisioning, gaps remain in capital formation and price discovery. Teams launching tokens on Hyperliquid often need to secure funding off chain, manually provide their own liquidity to seed HIP-2 pools, or release tokens into relatively thin order books. These limitations have meant that, despite its technical strengths, Hyperliquid has not yet reached feature parity with other high-performance ecosystems and exchanges when it comes to initial token offerings. HIP-6 is designed to close that gap, though participation will remain optional for projects. By integrating capital raising and liquidity seeding into a single on-chain flow, the proposal aims to simplify the process for founders. Funds raised during the auction would be split automatically between the token deployer and liquidity provision through HIP-2, reducing operational friction and reliance on external arrangements. Auction Structure And Ecosystem Growth A core component of the proposal is its approach to price discovery. Instead of a one‑time auction vulnerable to timing strategies, HIP-6 uses a continuous clearing auction that unfolds over multiple blocks. This structure is intended to determine a fair market price while minimizing the “sniping” and last‑minute bidding behavior often seen in traditional token launches. The upgrade also seeks to strengthen the broader ecosystem around Hyperliquid. By creating utility for aligned quote assets, HIP-6 could contribute to higher total value locked (TVL) in those assets and generate yield for the platform’s Assistance Fund. Related Reading: Circle Tops Q4 Revenue Forecasts, Shares Surge 30% — Key Numbers Inside While HIP-6 addresses how new tokens raise funds and establish initial liquidity, it does not dictate how those tokens create long-term value or how their governance systems operate. Mechanisms such as revenue sharing, buybacks, staking rewards, treasury oversight, or voting rights would remain up to individual projects. Similarly, tokenholder protections—such as treasury lockups, on-chain transparency requirements, or vesting schedules affecting both buyers and team allocations—would need to be built on top of the HIP-6 framework. The proposal’s stated objective is to make the initial auction process as efficient and equitable as possible, leaving post-launch design choices to the creativity of the Hyperliquid community. At the time of writing, HYPE, the platform’s native token, was trading at $27.430, representing a 3% drop over the previous 24 hours. Featured image from OpenArt, chart from TradingView.com
Arbitrum’s post-breakout predictions – Is $0.22 next for ARB’s price?
Here is why Arbitrum One's price rallied by double-digits in 24 hours.
Binance Surpasses $35B In Gold Volume As Crypto-Native Traders Disrupt Traditional Commodity Desks
Binance expanded its product suite on January 5 with the launch of gold futures trading, offering users 24/7 access to price exposure on the precious metal. The move reflects a broader trend within digital asset platforms: the convergence of traditional macro assets and crypto-native infrastructure. By introducing round-the-clock gold derivatives, Binance is positioning itself at the intersection of commodities and digital trading liquidity, enabling participants to hedge, speculate, or diversify without relying on legacy market hours. According to analysis shared by top analyst Darkfost, the timing is not coincidental. Since the beginning of 2024, gold has delivered an exceptional performance, rising nearly 160%. This sustained rally has reinforced gold’s role as a macro hedge amid inflationary pressures, geopolitical tensions, and shifting monetary expectations. As capital increasingly rotates toward hard assets, demand for flexible trading vehicles has intensified. The strong price momentum has naturally encouraged the development of gold-linked derivatives within crypto markets . For exchanges, this represents both a diversification strategy and a response to evolving trader preferences. For market participants, it offers continuous access to a traditionally time-restricted asset class. Gold Volumes Surge As Crypto Traders Seek Macro Exposure The rapid adoption of Binance’s gold futures product reveals more than opportunistic speculation — it reflects structural demand for macro exposure within crypto-native infrastructure. Reaching nearly $35 billion in cumulative trading volume , with over $4 billion recorded on the most active day, indicates that this is not a niche experiment but a product resonating with significant liquidity. A weekly average of $4.7 billion in volume further confirms sustained participation rather than a short-lived launch spike. Importantly, trading activity accelerated sharply after gold experienced a rapid two-day correction exceeding 20%. That reaction suggests traders are not merely passively holding exposure; they are actively managing volatility, using crypto rails to access macro hedges in real time. This behavior highlights a broader shift: crypto investors increasingly treat exchanges as multi-asset platforms rather than purely digital token venues. The ability to trade gold derivatives continuously, without the constraints of traditional market hours, creates tactical flexibility that legacy markets cannot match. For Binance, the strategic implication is clear. By integrating late-cycle macro assets like gold into its derivatives ecosystem, the exchange reinforces its position as a cross-market liquidity hub. It is not simply listing products — it is structuring access to global risk themes through crypto-native infrastructure. BNB Holds Macro Structure As Binance Expands Market Reach BNB remains technically constructive on the weekly timeframe despite recent volatility. After rallying toward the $1,300 region, price corrected sharply but is now stabilizing near the $600–$650 zone. Importantly, BNB continues to trade above its 200-week moving average, which remains upward sloping — a signal that the broader macro structure is still intact. While the 50-week average has flattened and short-term momentum has cooled, the asset has not broken down into a lower macro range. The recent pullback appears corrective rather than structurally destructive. Volume expanded during the selloff phase, reflecting de-risking across the broader crypto market, but has since moderated as price consolidates. From a structural standpoint, BNB’s resilience is closely tied to Binance’s dominant market position. The exchange continues to lead global spot and derivatives liquidity, and the recent success of its gold futures product — generating tens of billions in volume — reinforces its role as a cross-asset liquidity hub. As Binance expands beyond crypto-native products into macro-linked derivatives, it strengthens the utility layer supporting BNB. BNB’s long-term trajectory remains correlated with Binance’s ecosystem growth. If the platform continues capturing multi-asset volume — including gold — structural demand for BNB could remain supported despite broader market turbulence. Featured image from ChatGPT, chart from TradingView.com
Mt. Gox's former CEO floats hard fork to recover 80K hacked Bitcoin
Mark Karpelès said it has been 12 years since the start of Mt. Gox’s bankruptcy proceedings and “this is probably the last sore point on this whole case.”
Buying Bitcoin Before $54,420 May be Premature, Bollinger Bands Warn
Bollinger Bands suggest that buying Bitcoin before $54,420 carries high risk, while this price point may present an opportunity last seen in 2022.
APT Technical Analysis February 28, 2026: Volume and Accumulation
APT's 24h volume at 102.21M stays below the average, not confirming the decline; this divergence gives an accumulation signal. While market participation is low, BTC's downtrend increases altcoin r...
Bitcoin slides to $65,000 in weekend sell-off, with solana, XRP, dogecoin down 6%
The pullback erased most of Wednesday's push toward $70,000 as hot producer-price data and a post-earnings Nvidia decline dragged risk assets lower heading into the weekend.
WLD Technical Analysis February 28, 2026: Will It Rise or Fall?
WLD at $0.39 is at critical levels; a breakout above $0.3929 could trigger an upside move, while a breakout below $0.3853 could trigger a downside. MACD positivity supports the bullish scenario, wh...
‘Making Bitcoin Bankable’: Citi Plans 2026 BTC Integration With Traditional Finance
A Citibank executive has announced the firm’s plan to introduce infrastructure “to make Bitcoin (BTC) bankable” as part of a broader institutional push to integrate the flagship cryptocurrency into traditional financial systems. Citi To Integrate Bitcoin Into Traditional Finance On Thursday, Nisha Surendran, Citi’s head of digital asset custody development, revealed that the bank will introduce infrastructure to integrate Bitcoin and traditional finance in 2026. Speaking at Strategy World 2026 in Las Vegas, the executive highlighted the need for a 24/7 dollar or digital money as the world adapts round-the-clock assets like Bitcoin and transitions into 24/7 systems and processes. Surendran shared Citi’s “one big idea” to “make Bitcoin bankable.” As she explained, the baking giant plans to launch its own infrastructure that integrates BTC into traditional finance later this year, although no specific date was disclosed. To achieve this, Citi will focus on three key areas: core custody and safekeeping capabilities, institutional-grade key management, and wallet infrastructure. This will enable clients to hold and manage Bitcoin positions alongside traditional assets. “We will also be bringing Bitcoin into the fold of the $30 trillion traditional assets that our clients entrust to us today. It will be the same framework that’s applied now, brought to Bitcoin,” Surendran stated. Notably, the bank is set to offer its clients a “single service model across crypto, securities, and money,” extending the same reporting channels, compliance frameworks, and tax workflows that traditional assets fall into to BTC. In addition, Citi will focus on simplification and standardization, noting that its clients won’t have to deal with wallets, keys, and one-time addresses as it will “take care of those problems” through its infrastructure. Morgan Stanley Joins Institutional Push Citi’s initiative follows broader efforts to make BTC accessible within traditional finance. On Wednesday, banking giant Morgan Stanley revealed that it is preparing to expand its BTC and crypto offerings beyond simple access. Also at Strategy World 2026, Amy Oldenburg, Morgan Stanley’s head of digital asset strategy, shared the bank’s plan to move toward native custody and an internal exchange stack, while also exploring yield and lending services backed by the flagship cryptocurrency. Morgan Stanley will first allow E-Trade clients to buy and sell spot crypto assets through a partnership before moving to a native custody and exchange platform over the next year, the executive affirmed. Oldenburg suggested that this would put Morgan Stanley in a position to be the first major bank to offer that combination in-house. She shared that the firm must build its own platform before introducing BTC offerings to ensure its clients’ security. “We really need to build this out internally. We can’t just primarily rent the technology to do this. People expect Morgan Stanley, they trust our brand, to be no-fail. And when you sit in that position, you have a significant responsibility to your clients to make sure that you’re delivering that in any level of technology,” the executive stressed. Additionally, she confirmed that it is exploring crypto yield and lending products, but noted that the bank is still in the early design stage of those products. Earlier this year, Morgan Stanley filed for a registration statement for an Ethereum Trust with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). In October 2025, the bank also expanded its access to crypto fund investments for all clients, moving away from its previous customer restrictions. This shift allowed financial advisors to present crypto funds to any client, including those with retirement accounts.
Bitcoin ETF Investors Show Diamond Hands: Only $6.5B In Outflows Since October 10
Spot Bitcoin (BTC) Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have shown strength amid the crypto market’s correction and the flagship crypto’s latest performance. Some experts have praised investors’ resilience, suggesting that the “real story” is not in the recent outflows. Related Reading: Ethereum’s Fate Hangs On This Multi-Year Support – Recovery Or Deeper Pullback Next? ETFs Investors Hold Strong Despite Market Downturn On Thursday, Nate Geraci, co-founder of the ETF Institute, affirmed that Bitcoin ETF investors have “largely displayed diamond hands” during the recent crypto market downturn. The flagship crypto has seen a 48.2% correction from its October 6, 2025, all-time high (ATH), recording five consecutive months of strong bleeding after the October 10 market crash. Since then, spot BTC ETFs have seen about $6.5 billion in outflows, the expert observed, which he considers a “drop in the bucket” compared to the $55 billion in cumulative total net inflows that the category has seen since launching in January 2024. It’s worth noting that crypto-based investment products have seen five weeks of outflows this year, with Bitcoin having the weakest sentiment among major assets amid the negative market sentiment of the past month. According to SoSoValue data, BTC funds have recorded $3.81 billion in net outflows since January 23, starting the week with $203.82 million in outflows on Monday. However, Geraci highlighted potential renewed demand for the investment products as the category sees a three-day streak of consistent inflows. Notably, Bitcoin ETFs have seen over $1 billion in inflows over the past three days, setting the stage for their potential biggest week since mid-January. The ETF expert emphasized that 50% drawdowns “are a walk in the park for long-time BTC investors,” but observed that newer ETF investors also appear unfazed by the current market conditions. “Not first time btc has experienced 50% decline & likely won’t be the last. ETF investors clearly aren’t panicking, though. Apparently buying the dip,” he wrote on X. Bitcoin ETFs Strength Is The ‘Real Story’ Bloomberg Intelligence Senior ETF Analyst Eric Balchunas backed Geraci’s comment, praising the remarkable performance of spot Bitcoin ETFs over the past two years. “As an ETF watcher, you know just how absurd this strength amid a 50% drawdown,” Balchunas stated. “This is the real story, vs focusing on the $6b that came out, which most stories do.” “Further, the narrative that crypto is ‘paying the price’ for getting financialized is absurd. $55b in net new cash in two years is the opposite of paying the price,” he added on X. In a recent interview, the senior analyst observed that the amount of Bitcoin held by ETFs is only down around 6% despite the market pullback. He noted that these types of corrections happen to every asset, including bonds and stocks, before recovering. Stocks have the same thing. Every time stocks go down, I remind myself and then other people that stocks have a 100% perfect record of coming back to hit all-time highs from a downturn. So, why would I worry that much, right? Related Reading: XRP Rally Incoming? Analyst Forecasts March-April Recovery If This Level Breaks Balchunas affirmed that these assets can have “really horrible streaks, but then when they come back around, the flows come back.” He concluded that the price volatility and the negative market sentiment are “the cost of the holy grail returns that most people have gotten.” Featured Image from Unsplash.com, Chart from TradingView.com
ASTER Technical Analysis February 28, 2026: Volume and Accumulation
ASTER's volume at 126.63M$ supports the sideways trend, low-volume declines signal accumulation. Market participation is limited, price-volume divergence carries bullish potential.
ICP Technical Analysis February 28, 2026: Risk and Stop Loss
ICP is trading under the downtrend at $2.46; high volatility and BTC pressure make capital protection strategies mandatory. The risk/reward ratio is disadvantageous for longs, with stop loss below ...
Bullish Sign? Bitcoin Nears Milestone as 100+ BTC Wallets Approach 20K
Bitcoin’s bullish setup is strengthening as wallets holding 100 BTC or more approach record levels, according to Santiment, which says this trend can be considered a bullish sign when it rises during or after price declines. Bitcoin Flashes Possible Bullish Sign as Large Holders Climb Toward 20,000 Threshold Crypto analytics platform Santiment shared on social
ETC Technical Analysis February 28, 2026: RSI MACD Momentum
ETC momentum shows RSI neutral at 44.77 with MACD positive histogram giving mixed signals, price below EMA20 carrying bearish short-term pressure. Lack of volume confirmation limits trend strength ...
All about U.S Congress’s new bill and its intent to protect open-source developers
Congress is advancing developer protections as BRCA and other crypto bills reshape U.S policy.
The Distribution Trap: Why Bitcoin’s Reserve Growth Proves Sellers Still Hold The Tape
Bitcoin has reclaimed the $66,000 level and is now attempting to consolidate above it in order to extend its recovery. The move has improved short-term momentum, but structural signals suggest that upside conviction remains fragile. Holding above $66K is technically important, yet the broader supply backdrop may limit the sustainability of further gains. Related Reading: Engine Stalled: How The $8 Billion ‘October Shock’ Left Bitcoin’s Spot Market In A Liquidity Trap According to analyst Axel Adler, cumulative exchange netflows remain a critical constraint. As long as netflows stay positive — meaning more Bitcoin is moving onto exchanges than leaving them — the probability of sustained price expansion remains limited. Recent data from the Bitcoin Exchange Reserve (All Exchanges, Daily) metric reinforces this caution. Since January 14, total BTC held across major exchanges has increased from 2.723 million to 2.752 million BTC, representing a net addition of roughly 28,489 BTC, or about 1% over 45 days. Although the trajectory has not been linear — with a local peak near 2.794 million BTC in early February followed by a partial pullback — reserves have consistently re-established themselves near the upper bound of the range. This stepwise growth structure signals a persistent return of coins to exchanges. Historically, rising exchange balances imply expanding potential sell-side supply. Until reserves break decisively below January’s 2.723 million BTC baseline, structural selling pressure remains embedded in the market. Netflow Regime Shift Signals Structural Distribution The 30-day moving average of Bitcoin exchange netflows provides critical confirmation that the recent reserve growth is not incidental. The transition from -1,187 BTC on January 14 to +628 BTC by February 27 represents more than a short-term fluctuation — it reflects a structural regime shift from accumulation to distribution. When the SMA(30) netflow remains negative, it indicates coins are being withdrawn from exchanges faster than they are deposited, typically associated with accumulation behavior. The steady climb toward zero throughout January, followed by a decisive cross into positive territory on February 1, marks a clear behavioral pivot. The fact that the indicator has held above zero for nearly four consecutive weeks significantly reduces the probability of a false breakout. The mid-February impulse toward +1,069 BTC highlights the intensity of inflows during peak distribution pressure. Although the metric moderated afterward, it did not revert below zero, suggesting that coins continue to migrate toward exchanges at a sustained pace. At an average structural inflow rate of roughly 628 BTC per day, the supply available for potential sale is expanding. Until the SMA(30) decisively flips back into negative territory, exchange-side pressure remains dominant, limiting the probability of a durable bullish regime reestablishing itself. Related Reading: The $2,000 Fault Line: Why Ethereum’s Record Volatility Signals An Imminent Explosion Bitcoin Tests Macro Support After Rejection From Highs Bitcoin’s weekly structure reflects a clear transition from expansion to correction following rejection near the $120K–$130K region. The chart shows a decisive breakdown below the $90K–$95K zone, which previously acted as structural support. That level has now flipped into resistance, confirming a shift in market control. Price is currently consolidating near $66K after a sharp decline, hovering just above the 200-week moving average. This level historically acts as a macro support during deeper corrective phases. Holding above it is technically significant; sustained closes below would likely signal a more prolonged bear cycle. The 50-week moving average has rolled over and is trending downward, while the 100-week average is flattening. This alignment indicates weakening intermediate momentum and suggests rallies may face overhead pressure unless key trend levels are reclaimed. Related Reading: Digital Gold Is Dead: The Institutional Architecture Binding Bitcoin To The Nasdaq In The 2026 Downturn Volume expanded notably during the breakdown phase, pointing to forced liquidations and distribution rather than orderly consolidation. Since then, participation has moderated, implying that panic selling has eased but conviction remains limited. Structurally, Bitcoin sits at a pivotal inflection point. A reclaim of the mid-$80K region would be required to restore bullish structure. Conversely, failure to defend current support could expose deeper liquidity zones below. Featured image from ChatGPT, chart from TradingView.com
Shiba Inu Inflows Hit the +531 Billion Increase That Pushes Risks Above the Safe Thershold
Shiba Inu exchanges seeing substantial growth in market activity, with half a trillion tokens flowing in.
The 2.4 Million Ethereum Anchor: How Binance’s Illiquid Supply Is Absorbing ETH’s February Volatility
Ethereum is navigating a period of heightened volatility and uncertainty as it hovers around the critical $2,000 threshold. While recent price action suggests temporary stabilization after weeks of selling pressure, conviction remains limited. The $2,000 level is functioning less as confirmed support and more as a psychological battleground where short-term positioning, liquidity conditions, and sentiment are colliding. A recent analysis from Arab Chain offers additional structural insight through the ETH Binance Liquid vs. Illiquid Supply Model. This framework separates Ethereum held on Binance into liquid supply — coins readily available for trading — and illiquid supply, which is comparatively less likely to move in the short term. As of February, Binance’s total ETH reserves stand at approximately 3.57 million ETH. Of this amount, around 1.16 million ETH is classified as liquid supply, while 2.40 million ETH is categorized as illiquid. This distribution matters. A relatively smaller liquid component can limit immediate sell-side pressure, but it does not eliminate risk if sentiment deteriorates. Conversely, a larger illiquid base may reflect longer holding behavior or strategic positioning rather than imminent distribution. At a moment when price hovers near a key technical pivot, the composition of exchange reserves becomes a meaningful variable in assessing Ethereum’s next structural move. Liquid vs. Illiquid Supply Signals A Fragile Equilibrium The current reserve composition on Binance suggests Ethereum is operating within a structurally balanced environment rather than an immediate distribution phase. With illiquid supply accounting for the majority of the 3.57 million ETH held on the platform, a substantial portion of coins appears relatively dormant. Illiquid balances are typically associated with longer holding horizons or reduced trading frequency, which tends to dampen immediate sell-side pressure. This matters at a time when ETH is hovering near $2,000. A dominant illiquid share implies that most holders are not actively positioning for a rapid exit. In previous cycles, sharp increases in liquid supply often preceded volatility spikes, as coins became readily available for market execution. That dynamic is not yet evident at scale. By contrast, liquid supply historically expands during speculative phases, when traders rotate capital aggressively or prepare for directional exposure. The absence of a pronounced expansion suggests that, for now, speculative intensity remains contained. The relatively stable gap between liquid and illiquid supply indicates equilibrium between holding behavior and active trading. However, this balance is conditional. A meaningful shift toward higher liquid supply would increase the probability of renewed volatility. Conversely, sustained illiquid dominance could help absorb price shocks and moderate downside acceleration. Ethereum Tests Long-Term Support As Downtrend Accelerates Ethereum remains under structural pressure as price hovers near the $2,000 region following a sharp breakdown from the $3,200–$3,400 zone. The weekly chart shows a clear loss of bullish structure, with lower highs forming since the late-2025 peak and momentum decisively shifting to the downside. Price is now trading below the 50-week and 100-week moving averages, both of which are beginning to flatten or slope downward. This configuration typically signals weakening intermediate momentum and a transition into a corrective phase. Notably, Ethereum briefly tested levels near $1,800 before bouncing, suggesting the presence of reactive demand in that liquidity pocket. However, the recovery remains limited and has not yet reclaimed key moving averages. The 200-week moving average, positioned lower on the chart, remains upward sloping, indicating that the broader macro trend has not fully reversed. Historically, this level has served as strong structural support during deeper cycle corrections. If downside pressure resumes, this zone could become a critical area to monitor. Volume expanded significantly during the recent selloff, reflecting forced positioning adjustments rather than gradual distribution. Since then, activity has moderated, pointing to temporary stabilization. Featured image from ChatGPT, chart from TradingView.com
AAVE Technical Analysis February 28, 2026: Support and Resistance Levels and Market Commentary
AAVE is being tested at critical support levels at 112.80 dollars; RSI at 40 shows weak momentum, while MACD gives a mildly bullish signal. Bitcoin's downtrend is increasing pressure on altcoins; m...
Morgan Stanley Crypto Custody Bank Application
Morgan Stanley applied to the OCC for a national trust bank for digital asset custody. BTC testing support at 65.924$; institutional expansion is accelerating. Details and technical analysis here. ...
Senate Deadlock Stalls US Crypto Regulation Over Stablecoin Yields
The CLARITY Act’s stablecoin yield debate stalls US digital asset regulation in the Senate. Banks want strict limits, while crypto advocates warn against stifling innovation. Continue Reading: Senate Deadlock Stalls US Crypto Regulation Over Stablecoin Yields The post Senate Deadlock Stalls US Crypto Regulation Over Stablecoin Yields appeared first on COINTURK NEWS .
NEAR Technical Analysis February 28, 2026: Volume and Accumulation
NEAR volume declined to 165.68 million dollars, remaining low during pullbacks and limiting selling pressure. While this provides accumulation signals, BTC correlation requires caution.
Morgan Stanley applies for OCC bank charter to custody crypto
The Wall Street banking giant has been accelerating its foray into crypto, filing to launch Bitcoin, Ether and Solana ETFs in January.
Assessing if ICP’s whales can help it flip $3-level after 10% daily hike
ICP investors welcomed some good news this week.
XRP Builder Funding Shifts In 2026 As Ripple Backs New Model
Ripple is reshaping how builders on the XRP Ledger get funded in 2026, arguing that the ecosystem has reached a point where support needs to flow through more than Ripple-linked programs alone. The change matters because it signals a deliberate move away from a relatively centralized funding structure toward a broader network of DAOs, independent hubs, universities and venture partners. In its latest ecosystem update , Ripple said more than $550 million has already been deployed into XRPL initiatives since 2017, spanning non-equity grants, builder incentives, strategic partnerships and growth programs. Since 2021, those efforts have included hackathons, builder bounties, XRPL Grants and the XRPL Accelerator, with nearly 200 projects supported across areas including payments, DeFi, tokenization, AI, gaming, e-commerce and enterprise finance. XRP Ledger Enters New Phase The core message is that 2026 marks a structural pivot. Ripple said ecosystem funding has historically flowed through Ripple-supported channels, but that the next phase will lean on a “more distributed model” in which independent organizations, regional hubs, venture firms and community-led initiatives take on a larger role. The company framed the objective as giving builders “multiple channels” to access capital and support, rather than relying on a single gatekeeper. At the center of that shift is a new FinTech Builder Program aimed at startups building institutional-grade financial applications on XRPL. Ripple said the program will focus on use cases including stablecoin payments , credit infrastructure, tokenization and regulated financial services, while offering more than a traditional grants track. According to the post, founders will get support “across the entire development lifecycle,” from product design through market launch, with help on XRPL integration, strategy and partnerships. Ripple also outlined a wider support stack around that program. That includes expanded accelerator partnerships with venture firms and startup platforms, regional startup competitions, and builder awards meant to help projects after hackathons or competitions, when early traction still needs a bridge to something durable. The emphasis throughout is less on one-off experimentation and more on getting teams to production-ready financial products. The more interesting signal, though, may be where decision-making starts to move. Ripple highlighted XAO DAO as a hybrid DAO built for XRPL that will fund developers, community builders and early-stage ideas through microgrants. It said the DAO is designed to “amplify community voice” and create feedback loops where members submit proposals, vote on priorities and help steer the ecosystem’s direction. In parallel, XRPL Commons is positioned as an independent pillar of support, with Ripple explicitly saying the aim is to ensure that “no single organization becomes the sole gatekeeper” for ecosystem funding. Other pieces of the 2026 map point to geographic and institutional expansion. Ripple said XRP Asia is being developed as a dedicated APAC hub with a long-term plan for localized funding and regional ecosystem growth. UDAX, first launched with UC Berkeley in fall 2025, is set to expand this year to Fundação Getulio Vargas in São Paulo, Oxford in the summer, and Berkeley again in the fall. Ripple also pointed to growing venture participation from firms including Dragonfly, Pantera, Franklin Templeton and Tenity as another sign that XRPL is trying to mature from grant-backed experimentation into a venue for fundable, production-scale startups. At press time, XRP traded at $1.3773.
Bitcoin Manipulation By Jane Street? Ex-Wall Street Market Maker Says No
The latest Jane Street debate on X is meeting a blunt rebuttal from Ari Paul. The BlockTower founder, who says he used to work as a Wall Street market maker 15 years ago, argues that Bitcoin’s failure to push higher is better explained by spot sell-side than by a long-running suppression campaign. Paul’s answer was direct. “In short: no,” he wrote, before adding that market makers do “game the system” in many ways, but that in liquid products such as BTC ETFs, the effect is usually limited to “meaningful but small costs to consumers,” not a lasting distortion of the underlying asset price. He framed the distinction as one between short-term microstructure games and a broader claim that one firm kept Bitcoin from reaching far higher levels. Bitcoin Manipulation? Small Moves, Fast Reversions To make that case, Paul pointed to the kind of behavior traders on desks know well. “For example, market makers may manipulate the price to run stop limit orders,” he wrote. “But that’s typically on an intraday timeframe. So they might run an asset like MSFT or BTC 2% in a weak market to trigger stops, then a few seconds or minutes later, the price is mostly back to where it was before.” In his telling, that is still manipulation, but it is not the same as structurally pinning Bitcoin below some imagined fair value for months. Related Reading: Bitcoin Spot Volumes Sink To 2024 Lows As Coinbase Selling Pressure Eases That argument lands against a more conspiratorial narrative now circulating online, why Bitcoin is not already at $150,000. Paul’s pushback does not deny that large Wall Street firms can shape short-term trading conditions. It rejects the stronger claim that such activity is the central explanation for Bitcoin’s broader price path. Paul’s core point was much less dramatic. “Why is BTC down? Because OGs sold tens of thousands of coins, and not enough people wanted to buy them.” That line closely matched the view from renowned on-chain analyst James Check, who argued that “Jane Street didn’t suppress the Bitcoin price” and that “HODLers all did,” by selling large amounts of spot into the market. Jane Street didn’t suppress the Bitcoin price folks. HODLers all did. It’s just not that hard, stop summoning your inner salty goldbug but blaming manipulators. People. Sold. A. Fucktonne. Of. Spot. Bitcoin. https://t.co/CrWgPUzUFP pic.twitter.com/N3VhgYjKhm — _Checkmate 🟠🔑⚡☢️🛢️ (@_Checkmatey_) February 26, 2026 He added: “My point has always been the same; manipulation is a thing that has always, will always, and is indeed the literal job of large wall street firms. However, you do not need that as the central argument to explain why the price didn’t go higher, nor why it went lower. That can be well and truly explained by looking at spot sell-side.” Paul did leave room for exceptions. He wrote that there are rare cases where Wall Street manipulates an asset in major ways over a longer period, but said those cases are uncommon because they are risky and harder to profit from than people assume. Related Reading: Is Jane Street Why Bitcoin Isn’t At $150K? Expert Debunks The Myth “There are rare exceptions where Wall Street manipulates an asset in major ways longer term, but this is quite rare because it’s very risky and not as easy as it looks to profit. 99% of the time that an asset isn’t moving like you want and people are crying “manipulation”, it’s best to embrace the cognitive dissonance, avoid the “easy way out” of blaming manipulation,” Paul wrote. That leaves the current Jane Street argument in a narrower frame. Yes, large firms can influence intraday flows, liquidity, and execution quality. But based on Paul’s account, that is a long way from proving that one market maker is the reason Bitcoin is not trading materially higher. Notably, the Jane Street theory picked up fresh attention after Terraform Labs’ wind-down administrator sued the firm in Manhattan federal court, alleging insider trading tied to Terra’s 2022 collapse. The complaint says Jane Street used a private chat called “Bryce’s Secret” to obtain non-public information and alleges an 85 million UST trade on Curve that helped trigger a selloff; Jane Street has denied wrongdoing and called the case opportunistic. At press time, BTC traded at $66,090. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
UNI Technical Analysis February 28, 2026: Market Structure
In UNI, LH/LL downtrend dominates, $3.6776 support is critical. Bullish BOS above $3.7612, BTC downtrend is increasing the downward pressure.
DOT Technical Analysis February 28, 2026: RSI MACD Momentum
In DOT's momentum, MACD is giving a short-term bull signal with a positive histogram while RSI is balancing at the neutral level of 57. EMA20 support is preserving trend strength, but BTC's downtre...
MARA Holdings Weathers $1.71 Billion Loss, Banks on AI and Data Center Expansion
MARA Holdings reported a $1.71 billion loss, mainly caused by Bitcoin's steep price decline. The company is shifting focus toward artificial intelligence and data center investments. Continue Reading: MARA Holdings Weathers $1.71 Billion Loss, Banks on AI and Data Center Expansion The post MARA Holdings Weathers $1.71 Billion Loss, Banks on AI and Data Center Expansion appeared first on COINTURK NEWS .
CC Technical Analysis February 28, 2026: Will It Rise or Fall?
CC at $0.17 in critical resistance/support range; although Robinhood listing is a bullish catalyst, BTC downtrend keeps downside risk intact. Breakout above $0.1731 for upside, below $0.1664 for do...
Trump orders US agencies to halt Anthropic AI use after Pentagon ethics dispute
The US President Donald Trump blacklisted Anthropic, mandating a federal ban on its technology following an intense disagreement between the AI firm and the Pentagon on matters regarding the military’s application of this technology. At this moment, negotiations between Anthropic and the Department of Defense had stalled, as both sides refused to compromise, while the deadline to reach an agreement approached. Concerning the Pentagon’s request , sources said officials at the United States Department of Defense headquarters demanded that Anthropic loosen its ethical guidelines; failure to do so could result in severe repercussions. Meanwhile, Trump shared a post on Truth Social outlining his viewpoint on the matter. In the post, he noted that, “The Leftwing extremists at Anthropic have made a DISASTROUS MISTAKE by trying to STRONG-ARM the Department of War and forcing them to follow their Terms of Service instead of our Constitution,” further adding that, “WE will determine our Country’s future – NOT some out-of-control, Radical Left AI firm led by people who don’t understand what the real world is like.” Notably, during this time, the deadline was merely one hour away. Anthropic-Pentagon’s dispute sparks security concerns Earlier, Anthropic declined Pentagon officials’ request for contractors to grant approval for the utilization of their systems for any lawful purpose. At this point, the AI firm refused to ease limitations that prevented Claude from being used effectively for mass domestic surveillance or for fully autonomous weapons. Given the intensity of the situat ion , Trump characterized the incident as a significant threat to US troops and national security. In a statement, he argued that, “Their selfishness is putting American lives at risk, our troops in danger, and our national security in jeopardy.” Following Trump’s argument, reports highlighted that Sam Altman, the CEO of OpenAI, demonstrated efforts to calm things down. Even so, several analysts admitted that reducing tensions remains a tough task . On the other hand, Pete Hegseth, the United States Secretary of Defense, argued that labeling Anthropic a supply chain risk threatened to terminate the connection between US military vendors and the AI company. Hegseth made these remarks roughly 24 hours after the CEO of Anthropic, Dario Amodei, issued a statement alleging that his firm cannot comply with the Defense Department’s request. According to him, the request was against Anthropic’s conscience. This situation prompted analysts to conduct research, which revealed that the defense contract dispute centers on AI in national security. In the meantime, after months of private dialogue, the AI firm recently decided to make the discussion public, noting that the new contract language, framed as a compromise, was written in legal jargon that effectively rendered the stated protections susceptible to constant neglect. Generative AI secures popularity among several companies amid the AI boom era Regarding the heated conflict between Anthropic and the Pentagon, reports highlighted that the generative AI field leverages advanced models to create realistic but inaccurate software code, text, images, and other outputs that closely mimic human creativity. To achieve this outcome, some sources noted that the models function by identifying underlying patterns in the training data to produce context-aware responses to user inputs. At this point, it is worth noting that Generative AI moves beyond mere analysis to actively generating content. According to analysts’ research, this capability could revolutionize numerous industries, including defense. At the same time, developing these models poses serious challenges, including ethical concerns and potential existential risks. Even so, several companies have demonstrated a strong commitment to allocating substantial funds to the field. For instance, Pentagon officials released a statement last summer claiming they had secured individual contracts with major industry players, including OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, and xAI. Notably, each contract was reported to be valued at $200 million, particularly for frontier artificial intelligence initiatives. At this particular moment, reports highlighted that Anthropic views itself as a committed company to the responsible development and deployment of AI technologies. To underscore this dedication, the firm labels itself a “Public Benefit Corporation,” asserting its commitment to developing and maintaining safe, advanced AI for the lasting benefit of humanity. Get seen where it counts. Advertise in Cryptopolitan Research and reach crypto’s sharpest investors and builders.
Ethereum’s Market Order Imbalance Hits Record Negatives: $1,850 Is Now The Line In The Sand
Ethereum is attempting to stabilize around the $2,000 level as the broader crypto market shows tentative signs of relief. After weeks of persistent pressure, price action has paused its decline, but sentiment remains fragile. The recent rebound has helped ease immediate downside momentum, yet the technical structure still reflects a market recovering from significant damage rather than entering a confirmed uptrend. Related Reading: Engine Stalled: How The $8 Billion ‘October Shock’ Left Bitcoin’s Spot Market In A Liquidity Trap According to a CryptoQuant analyst, Ethereum endured a severe liquidation-driven sell-off in recent weeks, falling sharply from local highs near $3,300 to lows around the $1,850 region. The intensity of this move becomes particularly evident when analyzing the Net Taker Volume (30-day moving average), a metric that measures aggressive market order activity. In February, this indicator plunged to its most negative level since last November, highlighting the dominance of aggressive sellers during the decline. Such extreme negative readings typically reflect panic-driven execution rather than orderly repositioning. When taker volume skews heavily to the sell side, it often signals forced exits, stop-outs, and cascading liquidations across derivatives markets. While Ethereum’s attempt to hold $2,000 suggests that immediate selling pressure may be easing, the underlying data confirms that the market recently absorbed one of its most intense bouts of downside aggression in months. Net Taker Volume Signals Capitulation — But Not Confirmation The dominance of towering red bars in Ethereum’s Net Taker Volume underscores how aggressively sellers controlled the order books during the recent decline. When taker sell orders consistently exceed taker buy orders by such a magnitude, it reflects urgency. This is not passive distribution; it is market participants hitting bids aggressively, often under stress. The combination of panic-driven exits, systematic short positioning, and forced long liquidations likely amplified the move from $3,300 to sub-$1,900 levels. Notably, the only meaningful cluster of green bars — representing aggressive buying — emerged in mid-January, coinciding with Ethereum’s local peak near $3,400. That brief resurgence in demand failed to sustain itself, after which sell-side momentum reasserted control. Structurally, this pattern suggests that upside liquidity was exhausted before a broader deleveraging cycle unfolded. Extreme negative Net Taker Volume readings are often associated with capitulation phases. Historically, such flushes can mark exhaustion points, as aggressive sellers eventually deplete themselves. However, capitulation alone does not confirm reversal. For a structural shift to materialize, the imbalance must normalize. A contraction in red bars followed by sustained green dominance would signal renewed conviction from aggressive buyers. Related Reading: The $2,000 Fault Line: Why Ethereum’s Record Volatility Signals An Imminent Explosion Ethereum Struggles To Reclaim $2,000 As Downtrend Persists Ethereum remains structurally weak despite brief stabilization attempts near the $2,000 level. The chart shows a clear breakdown from the $3,400–$3,600 region earlier this year, followed by a sequence of lower highs and lower lows — a textbook downtrend formation. The recent bounce has not altered this structure. Price is currently trading below the 50-day, 100-day, and 200-day moving averages, all of which are sloping downward. This alignment confirms bearish momentum across short-, medium-, and long-term horizons. Notably, the 50-day average has accelerated lower, reflecting sustained selling pressure rather than a temporary liquidity vacuum. Related Reading: Digital Gold Is Dead: The Institutional Architecture Binding Bitcoin To The Nasdaq In The 2026 Downturn The sharp decline toward the $1,850 zone was accompanied by a significant spike in volume, suggesting forced liquidations and aggressive distribution. Since then, volume has moderated during consolidation, indicating that while panic may have eased, conviction among buyers remains limited. Technically, $2,000 functions as a psychological pivot rather than confirmed support. A sustained move above the 50-day average would be required to signal improving momentum. Conversely, failure to hold the current range could reopen downside risk toward deeper liquidity pockets. Featured image from ChatGPT, chart from TradingView.com
Year Of The Underdog: Why Dogecoin Is On The Verge Of A Major Recovery
It has been a brutal few months for Dogecoin in terms of price action. At the time of writing, Dogecoin is trading just below $0.10, below all of its moving averages, and sitting more than 86% below its all-time high. The price action looks bad for Dogecoin; however, a look at the on-chain data tells an entirely different story of resilience and network activity that’s being ignored. If history is any guide, this is exactly the kind of environment before a major recovery. Dogecoin’s Network Growth Price is often the last thing to move during rallies. Before any significant rally materializes, bullish sentiment tends to show up first in the data, and right now, Dogecoin’s network data is showing signs that demand serious attention. At the time of writing, daily active addresses are currently around 54,500, having recently spiked to nearly 58,000 this week. Even more notable is the longer-term trend. As noted by crypto analyst PennybagsCX on X, average address activity has grown from 806,000 earlier in the year to above 1.05 million in recent readings. This growth is happening during a price dip, showing participants are choosing to engage with the network at a time when it would be easy to walk away. For context, Dogecoin currently ranks third among all Proof-of-Work blockchains by 24-hour active addresses, commanding a 12% share of total PoW activity and outperforming blockchains like Dash and Bitcoin Cash. Buyers Are Hunting, Long-Term Holders Holding Derivatives’ positioning is also starting to tilt bullish. According to Coinglass’ long/short ratio data across Binance, OKX, and Bybit, retail traders are heavily positioned on the long side. On Binance, the retail long/short ratio stands at 2.29, while whale accounts show a ratio of 2.73, both indicating bullish sentiment. Whale positions on Binance also have a 1.94 long bias. Retail positioning on OKX is more pronounced, with a long/short ratio of 3.49, categorized as extremely bullish. Whale accounts on OKX show a 1.61 ratio leaning bullish, although whale positions currently have a more cautious stance in open exposure at 0.79. Bybit data shows similar optimism, with retail at 2.98 and whale accounts at 2.99 on the long side. Whale positions on Bybit are also close to neutral at 0.99, suggesting balanced positioning but not outright bearish pressure. The only note of caution in the data is Smart Money Sentiment, which reads as bearish across all three of the biggest Dogecoin exchanges. Another telling signal has been the Taker Volume Ratio, which recently climbed to around 63%. This means traders executing market buy orders are dominating the activity. When the ratio moves above 50%, it means a stronger demand, as buyers are willing to pay prevailing prices. Furthermore, Dogecoin’s Profit-Days metric has surpassed 1,100 for the first time in its history . This long-cycle indicator moves based on sustained profitability among holders. History shows that moves above 800 days are major turning points that were followed by parabolic runs in subsequent months.
Undervalued but structurally weak: Bitcoin’s current cycle paradox
The MVRV Z-score reached -3.38 in the first week of February. The previous two cycle bottoms saw readings of -1.6 and -1.4, respectively.
TON Technical Analysis February 28, 2026: Market Structure
TON market structure in LH/LL downtrend; $1.3019 resistance critical for BOS. If $1.2980 support breaks, bearish continuation, BTC downtrend increases altcoin risk.
Fidelity Discusses Bitcoin Moving From Short-Term Trade to Long-Term Macro Portfolio Asset
Bitcoin’s notorious four-year boom-and-bust cycle may be losing its grip as institutional demand, deeper liquidity, and shifting ownership patterns reshape market dynamics, potentially redefining how investors position bitcoin in long-term portfolios, according to Fidelity’s analysis. Fidelity: Bitcoin Is No Longer Just a Trade — It’s Emerging as a Core Long-Term Portfolio Asset Bitcoin’s long-standing four-year