News
WLFI Token Governance Unveils Bold Plan to Expand USD1 Stablecoin Reach
BitcoinWorld WLFI Token Governance Unveils Bold Plan to Expand USD1 Stablecoin Reach In a significant move for its ecosystem, World Liberty Financial (WLFI) has unveiled a pivotal governance proposal to allocate a portion of its token supply, aiming to dramatically expand the utility and adoption of its native USD1 stablecoin. This strategic initiative, reported by BeInCrypto and subject to a community vote ending January 4, represents a calculated effort to secure vital partnerships within the competitive cryptocurrency sector. The proposal currently garners a 53.22% approval rate, highlighting active stakeholder engagement. This development arrives at a critical juncture for digital assets, where stablecoin utility and real-world integration increasingly dictate project longevity and market trust. WLFI Token Proposal Aims for Strategic USD1 Stablecoin Growth The core of the World Liberty Financial governance proposal involves dedicating less than 5% of the project’s unlocked token supply to a targeted incentive program. Consequently, this fund seeks to onboard key partners, including decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols, payment gateways, and merchant services. The primary objective is to integrate the USD1 stablecoin into a wider array of financial applications. Therefore, this strategy mirrors broader industry trends where projects use treasury assets to bootstrap ecosystem growth and enhance token utility. Governance mechanisms, like the one WLFI employs, have become standard practice for decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) and token-based projects. These systems empower token holders to steer project development and treasury allocation. For instance, similar proposals have historically driven adoption for platforms like Uniswap and Aave. The WLFI vote underscores a mature approach to decentralized decision-making, where community consensus directly influences strategic financial planning. Analyzing the Stablecoin Landscape and Partnership Imperative The stablecoin market remains fiercely contested, dominated by giants like Tether (USDT) and USD Coin (USDC). For newer entrants like USD1, differentiation through unique utility and robust partnerships is not optional; it is essential for survival. A successful partnership strategy can unlock several critical use cases: DeFi Integration: Serving as a collateral asset or trading pair on lending and borrowing platforms. Cross-Border Payments: Enabling faster, cheaper remittances and business transactions. Merchant Adoption: Allowing e-commerce and physical stores to accept crypto payments with minimal volatility risk. Gaming & Metaverse: Functioning as an in-game currency or medium of exchange within virtual economies. Allocating tokens to incentivize such integrations is a proven growth tactic. However, the specific structure of WLFI’s incentive program—its vesting schedules, partner eligibility, and success metrics—will be crucial for its long-term effectiveness and value retention. Expert Perspective on Treasury Management and Tokenomics Financial analysts observing the crypto space often emphasize the delicate balance required in treasury management. “Allocating a small, single-digit percentage of the supply for growth is a measured, low-risk tactic,” notes a blockchain economist familiar with such proposals. “The key is ensuring the incentives create sustainable, fee-generating utility for the stablecoin, not just temporary volume. Projects must demonstrate a clear return on investment for the treasury to maintain holder confidence.” This perspective highlights that the market will scrutinize not just the vote’s outcome, but the subsequent execution and tangible results from any secured partnerships. The Governance Process and Current Voting Dynamics The ongoing vote, set to conclude on January 4, presents a live case study in decentralized governance. With a 53.22% approval rate, the proposal shows initial support but also reveals a notable faction of opposition or undecided voters. This dynamic is common in governance, where stakeholders weigh immediate token dilution against potential long-term value accretion. The voting mechanism itself, typically conducted on-chain via smart contracts, ensures transparency and immutability for all decisions. For context, the proposal’s structure aligns with 2025’s best practices for responsible crypto-economics. Limiting the allocation to under 5% mitigates sell-pressure concerns while providing a meaningful war chest for bounties, grants, or liquidity mining rewards. Successful execution could enhance the WLFI token’s fundamental value proposition by tying its success directly to the expanding use and demand for the USD1 stablecoin. Broader Implications for the Crypto Ecosystem This development extends beyond a single project’s roadmap. It reflects the maturation of the cryptocurrency industry, where systematic, community-driven planning replaces speculative hype. Furthermore, the focus on stablecoin utility addresses a core demand from regulators and traditional finance: demonstrating clear, compliant use cases for digital assets. As stablecoins become more embedded in global finance, projects that successfully navigate partnership landscapes may gain significant first-mover advantages in niche markets. The proposal also touches on the evolving narrative around assets linked to public figures. While the Trump family association brings attention, the market’s ultimate judgment will rely on the project’s technical merit, financial performance, and regulatory standing. Therefore, the success of the USD1 expansion plan could serve as a benchmark for other ventures seeking to leverage brand recognition with substantive product development. Conclusion The WLFI governance proposal to allocate under 5% of tokens for USD1 stablecoin expansion represents a strategic and calculated step toward enhancing real-world utility. By focusing on securing vital cryptocurrency sector partnerships, World Liberty Financial aims to transition its stablecoin from a mere digital asset to a functional tool within decentralized and traditional finance. The January 4 vote deadline and current 53.22% approval rate underscore the active role of token holders in shaping this future. Ultimately, the initiative’s success will hinge on executing high-value partnerships that generate sustainable demand, thereby validating the community’s decision and strengthening the entire WLFI ecosystem’s position in the competitive 2025 market. FAQs Q1: What is the WLFI governance proposal about? The proposal seeks community approval to use less than 5% of the unlocked WLFI token supply to fund an incentive program. This program aims to secure partnerships that will increase the use cases and adoption of the project’s native USD1 stablecoin. Q2: When does the vote on this proposal end? The governance vote is scheduled to conclude on January 4. Token holders can cast their votes until that date to determine the proposal’s fate. Q3: What is the current approval rate for the proposal? As reported, the proposal currently holds an approval rate of 53.22%, indicating majority support but not an overwhelming consensus. Q4: Why is expanding stablecoin use cases important for a project like WLFI? Stablecoin utility drives demand and liquidity. More use cases—like DeFi integration, payments, and merchant adoption—make the USD1 stablecoin more valuable and resilient, which can positively impact the entire WLFI ecosystem and token value. Q5: How does allocating tokens for partnerships work as a growth strategy? The tokens can be used as incentives or grants to entice other platforms (like exchanges, wallets, or payment processors) to integrate the USD1 stablecoin. This is a common method to bootstrap ecosystem growth without large upfront capital expenditure. This post WLFI Token Governance Unveils Bold Plan to Expand USD1 Stablecoin Reach first appeared on BitcoinWorld .
Flow Blockchain Exploit Triggers Controversial $3.9M Network Rollback Decision
BitcoinWorld Flow Blockchain Exploit Triggers Controversial $3.9M Network Rollback Decision The Flow blockchain, a foundational layer for major NFT ecosystems, now faces a critical governance test following a devastating $3.9 million exploit that has forced its team to propose a drastic and contentious network rollback. This security incident, which involved the illicit minting of FLOW and other major tokens, immediately cratered the asset’s price by 40% and ignited a fierce debate about protocol integrity and decentralized decision-making in the Web3 space. The proposed rollback represents a pivotal moment for the network, testing its resilience and community trust during a period of heightened scrutiny for blockchain security. Anatomy of the Flow Blockchain Exploit The security breach on the Flow network was both sophisticated and financially significant. According to on-chain analysis and subsequent reporting by The Block, an attacker successfully exploited a vulnerability to mint digital assets illegitimately. The illicitly created tokens included the network’s native FLOW token, wrapped Bitcoin (WBTC), wrapped Ethereum (WETH), and several prominent stablecoins. Consequently, the immediate market reaction was severe, with the price of FLOW plummeting nearly 40% as news of the hack spread across trading platforms and social media channels. This exploit highlights a persistent challenge in the blockchain industry: the security of cross-chain asset bridges and minting mechanisms. Furthermore, the incident occurred despite Flow’s positioning as an enterprise-grade chain, having powered high-profile NFT projects like NBA Top Shot and CryptoKitties. The network’s response, a planned state rollback, aims to revert the blockchain to a point before the malicious transactions, effectively erasing the fraudulent minting activity and restoring the ledger’s integrity. The Technical and Ethical Implications of a Network Rollback A network rollback, or chain reorganization, is one of the most drastic actions a blockchain development team can undertake. This process involves convincing the majority of network validators to agree to revert the chain’s state to a previous block, thereby undoing all transactions—both legitimate and illegitimate—that occurred after that point. Proponents argue it is a necessary tool to correct catastrophic failures and protect user funds. However, critics vehemently oppose the move, labeling it a violation of blockchain’s core immutability principle. The decision by the Flow team has drawn sharp criticism from certain quarters of the crypto community. Detractors argue the move was made unilaterally without sufficient prior communication or a transparent governance vote involving FLOW token holders and network validators. This approach raises fundamental questions about the decentralization of the Flow network and contrasts with the community-driven response mechanisms seen in other decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) following similar incidents. Immutability vs. Pragmatism: The rollback challenges the sacrosanct blockchain tenet of immutability for the pragmatic goal of user protection. Governance Transparency: The perceived lack of community consultation has sparked debate over who truly controls the network’s direction. Precedent Setting: This action sets a precedent for how Layer 1 chains may handle future critical exploits. Expert Analysis on Blockchain Security and Response Protocols Industry analysts and security experts consistently emphasize that a protocol’s response to an exploit is as critical as its preventative measures. A historical review of major hacks, such as the 2016 DAO attack on Ethereum that led to a hard fork and the creation of Ethereum Classic, provides crucial context. Similarly, the Poly Network hack in 2021 was resolved through cooperation and without a rollback, showcasing a different model. The Flow situation sits between these historical examples, forcing a re-examination of crisis response frameworks. Data from blockchain security firms like CertiK and Chainalysis indicates that total value lost to exploits and hacks exceeded $3.8 billion in 2024, making robust response plans essential. The speed and transparency of the Flow team’s communication following the exploit detection will be a key factor in market recovery. Moreover, the technical execution of the rollback itself carries risk; a poorly coordinated update could lead to chain splits or further instability, potentially exacerbating the initial damage. Market Impact and the Road to Recovery for FLOW The immediate 40% drop in FLOW’s price reflects a classic market response to a security failure, combining panic selling with a reassessment of the network’s risk profile. Market recovery will depend on several interconnected factors beyond the technical success of the rollback. Firstly, the team must provide a comprehensive post-mortem report detailing the root cause of the exploit and the specific patches implemented to prevent recurrence. Secondly, they must rebuild trust through improved governance processes, potentially incorporating more formalized community voting for future critical decisions. The long-term impact on Flow’s ecosystem, particularly its NFT projects and developer community, remains uncertain. While a successful recovery could demonstrate the network’s resilience, the controversy may push some projects to consider multi-chain strategies or alternative Layer 1 solutions. The event serves as a stark reminder to all blockchain participants about the importance of security audits, decentralized governance, and having clear, pre-established protocols for handling catastrophic events. Comparison of Major Blockchain Exploit Responses Blockchain/Protocol Year Value Lost Primary Response Outcome Ethereum (The DAO) 2016 $60M Contentious Hard Fork Chain Split (ETH/ETC) Poly Network 2021 $611M Negotiation & Asset Return Full Recovery Flow Network 2025 $3.9M Proposed Network Rollback Pending Conclusion The $3.9 million Flow blockchain exploit and the subsequent decision to execute a network rollback have created a defining moment for the NFT-focused network. This incident transcends a simple security failure, evolving into a complex test of governance, philosophy, and technical crisis management. The ultimate success of the rollback and the network’s ability to regain community trust will hinge on transparent communication, flawless execution, and a renewed commitment to decentralized decision-making. The broader cryptocurrency industry will watch closely, as the outcome will undoubtedly influence future protocols for handling similar catastrophic events on Layer 1 blockchains. FAQs Q1: What is a blockchain network rollback? A network rollback, or chain reorganization, is a process where network validators agree to revert the blockchain’s transaction history to a previous state. This action effectively erases all transactions, both good and bad, that occurred after the chosen block, and it is typically considered a last-resort measure to correct a major exploit or catastrophic bug. Q2: Why is the Flow rollback decision controversial? The decision is controversial because it challenges the fundamental blockchain principle of immutability—the idea that recorded transactions cannot be altered. Critics also argue the Flow team made the decision unilaterally without a transparent, community-driven governance process, raising concerns about the network’s decentralization. Q3: How did the attacker steal $3.9 million on the Flow blockchain? The attacker exploited a vulnerability that allowed for the illicit minting, or creation, of tokens. The malicious actor minted the network’s native FLOW token, along with wrapped versions of Bitcoin (WBTC) and Ethereum (WETH), and several stablecoins, which were then presumably swapped or moved off-chain to realize the $3.9 million value. Q4: What impact did the exploit have on the FLOW token price? Following the news of the exploit, the price of the FLOW token fell by approximately 40%. This is a common market reaction to a major security incident, reflecting panic selling and a rapid reassessment of the network’s security and stability by investors and traders. Q5: What are the risks associated with executing a network rollback? The primary risks include technical failure during the update, which could cause further chain instability or even a permanent chain split if not all validators agree. There is also significant reputational risk, as the action can damage trust in the network’s immutability and deter future developers and users who prioritize censorship-resistant and unchangeable ledgers. This post Flow Blockchain Exploit Triggers Controversial $3.9M Network Rollback Decision first appeared on BitcoinWorld .
Trump Russia Ukraine Agreement: Breakthrough Progress Signals Hopeful Path to Resolution
BitcoinWorld Trump Russia Ukraine Agreement: Breakthrough Progress Signals Hopeful Path to Resolution WASHINGTON, D.C., November 2024 – In a development that could reshape Eastern European geopolitics, President Donald Trump announced significant advancement in Russia-Ukraine negotiations, stating both nations are getting “much closer” to a potential agreement following his meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. This diplomatic progress represents a potentially pivotal moment in a conflict that has persisted for years, drawing global attention and involving complex international relationships. Trump Russia Ukraine Agreement Progress Signals Diplomatic Shift President Trump characterized his recent discussion with President Zelenskyy as “excellent” during remarks to reporters. Consequently, he revealed that negotiations have advanced substantially. Specifically, Trump noted they are getting “much closer” to an agreement, perhaps even being “very close.” However, he acknowledged that one or two difficult issues remain unresolved in the Russia-Ukraine negotiations. Meanwhile, President Zelenskyy independently confirmed progress in his discussions with the American leader, creating a rare moment of diplomatic alignment between the two administrations. The meeting occurred against a backdrop of ongoing tensions in Eastern Ukraine. Since 2014, conflict has persisted in the Donbas region, resulting in approximately 14,000 casualties according to United Nations estimates. Furthermore, the Minsk agreements, signed in 2014 and 2015, have faced implementation challenges despite international mediation efforts. Therefore, this new diplomatic momentum represents a potentially significant development in regional stability efforts. Historical Context of Russia-Ukraine Negotiations Understanding the current diplomatic progress requires examining the conflict’s complex history. Initially, tensions escalated following Ukraine’s 2014 Revolution of Dignity and Russia’s subsequent annexation of Crimea. Subsequently, separatist movements emerged in Donetsk and Luhansk, leading to prolonged armed conflict. International responses have included economic sanctions against Russia and diplomatic initiatives through various channels. Key Diplomatic Milestones in Ukraine Conflict Year Event Outcome 2014 Minsk Protocol Ceasefire agreement that subsequently collapsed 2015 Minsk II Agreement Comprehensive peace framework with implementation challenges 2019 Normandy Format Summit Limited progress on prisoner exchanges and disengagement 2022 Istanbul Peace Talks Initial discussions that ultimately stalled 2024 Trump-Zelenskyy Meeting Current breakthrough announcement The current diplomatic initiative builds upon these previous efforts while introducing new negotiation dynamics. Specifically, the Trump administration has pursued a distinctive approach to international conflict resolution, emphasizing bilateral discussions and pragmatic solutions. Consequently, this methodology appears to be yielding tangible progress where previous multilateral efforts encountered obstacles. Analysis of Remaining Negotiation Challenges Despite the optimistic assessment from both leaders, significant hurdles remain in the Russia-Ukraine negotiations. President Trump explicitly acknowledged “one or two difficult issues” requiring resolution before finalizing any agreement. Diplomatic analysts identify several persistent challenges: Territorial Control: Disagreements regarding the status of Crimea and Eastern Ukrainian regions Security Guarantees: Arrangements for Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity Implementation Mechanisms: Verification and enforcement procedures for any agreement International Sanctions: Potential lifting of economic restrictions against Russia Humanitarian Concerns: Prisoner exchanges and civilian protection measures These complex issues have defied resolution through previous diplomatic channels. However, the current progress suggests potential flexibility from negotiating parties. Moreover, the involvement of multiple international stakeholders adds layers of complexity to the negotiation process. European Union members, NATO allies, and regional neighbors all maintain significant interests in the conflict’s resolution. Geopolitical Implications of Potential Agreement A successful Russia-Ukraine agreement would carry substantial geopolitical consequences. First, it could potentially reshape security arrangements across Eastern Europe. Second, it might influence broader relations between Russia and Western nations. Third, it could establish precedents for resolving other frozen conflicts in the post-Soviet space. Regional experts note several potential outcomes from successful negotiations: Reduction of military tensions along the contact line in Eastern Ukraine Potential normalization of Russia-Ukraine bilateral relations Possible adjustments to international sanctions regimes Changes in European energy security calculations Impact on NATO’s eastern flank security posture These developments would unfold gradually following any formal agreement. Additionally, implementation would require careful monitoring and international verification mechanisms. Consequently, while the current announcement represents significant progress, the path to sustainable peace remains complex and challenging. International Response and Verification Considerations The international community has monitored these developments with cautious interest. European leaders have emphasized the importance of Ukraine’s sovereignty in any settlement. Meanwhile, international organizations stand ready to support implementation efforts. Verification mechanisms would likely involve multiple stakeholders to ensure compliance with agreement terms. Historical precedents suggest several verification approaches: International monitoring missions along the contact line Third-party verification of military disengagement International oversight of political process implementation Multilateral mechanisms for dispute resolution These elements would form crucial components of any comprehensive agreement. Furthermore, they would help build confidence among all parties involved. Therefore, while the current announcement focuses on diplomatic progress, implementation details remain critical for long-term success. Conclusion The announcement of significant progress in Trump Russia Ukraine agreement negotiations represents a potentially transformative moment in Eastern European diplomacy. While challenges remain, the advancement toward resolution demonstrates the potential of sustained diplomatic engagement. Ultimately, the path forward requires careful navigation of complex issues, but current developments offer renewed hope for peaceful resolution to a prolonged conflict. The international community now watches closely as negotiations continue toward what could become a landmark agreement in post-Cold War European security. FAQs Q1: What specific progress did President Trump announce regarding Russia-Ukraine negotiations? President Trump stated that negotiations are getting “much closer” to an agreement following his meeting with Ukrainian President Zelenskyy, though he acknowledged one or two difficult issues remain unresolved. Q2: How does this development relate to previous diplomatic efforts in the Ukraine conflict? This announcement builds upon previous initiatives including the Minsk agreements and Normandy Format talks, potentially representing a breakthrough where earlier efforts encountered implementation challenges. Q3: What are the main obstacles remaining in Russia-Ukraine negotiations? Key challenges include territorial control issues in Crimea and Eastern Ukraine, security guarantee arrangements, implementation mechanisms, sanctions relief, and humanitarian concerns including prisoner exchanges. Q4: How might a potential agreement affect international relations in Eastern Europe? A successful agreement could reduce military tensions, potentially normalize Russia-Ukraine relations, affect sanctions regimes, influence European energy security, and impact NATO’s eastern security posture. Q5: What verification mechanisms might support implementation of any Russia-Ukraine agreement? Potential verification approaches include international monitoring missions, third-party verification of military disengagement, oversight of political processes, and multilateral dispute resolution mechanisms. This post Trump Russia Ukraine Agreement: Breakthrough Progress Signals Hopeful Path to Resolution first appeared on BitcoinWorld .
Mirae Asset Group’s Strategic Move: Potentially Acquiring Korbit Crypto Exchange in Transformative $100M Deal
BitcoinWorld Mirae Asset Group’s Strategic Move: Potentially Acquiring Korbit Crypto Exchange in Transformative $100M Deal SEOUL, South Korea – Financial giant Mirae Asset Group reportedly engages in advanced discussions to acquire Korbit, South Korea’s fourth-largest cryptocurrency exchange, in a move that could significantly reshape the nation’s digital asset landscape. According to exclusive reporting from Chosun Biz, the potential acquisition represents a major strategic pivot for one of Asia’s largest financial conglomerates as traditional finance increasingly converges with digital asset markets. This development follows months of speculation about consolidation within South Korea’s competitive crypto exchange sector. Mirae Asset Group’s Potential Korbit Acquisition Details Mirae Asset Consulting, a non-financial affiliate of the conglomerate, reportedly leads negotiations to purchase controlling stakes in Korbit. The deal specifically targets shares held by NXC Corporation, Korbit’s largest shareholder with 60.5% ownership, and SK Planet, the second-largest shareholder controlling 31.5% of the exchange. Industry analysts estimate the transaction value between 100 billion and 140 billion won, equivalent to approximately $72.5 million to $101.4 million. This potential acquisition emerges during a period of regulatory maturation in South Korea’s cryptocurrency sector. Furthermore, the Financial Services Commission recently implemented stricter compliance requirements for digital asset exchanges. Consequently, smaller exchanges face increasing operational challenges. Meanwhile, larger players seek strategic partnerships to enhance their market positions. Strategic Implications for South Korea’s Crypto Market The potential Korbit acquisition represents more than a simple corporate transaction. Instead, it signals a broader trend of institutional adoption within digital asset markets. Mirae Asset Group manages over $600 billion in assets globally. Therefore, its entry into cryptocurrency exchange ownership could legitimize the sector for conservative investors. Additionally, traditional financial institutions increasingly recognize blockchain technology’s transformative potential. South Korea’s cryptocurrency exchange landscape currently features several dominant players: Upbit: Market leader with approximately 80% trading volume share Bithumb: Second-largest exchange facing ownership transitions Coinone: Established player with banking partnerships Korbit: Fourth-largest, known for early market entry Korbit holds particular historical significance as South Korea’s first cryptocurrency exchange, launching in 2013. Despite its pioneering status, the platform gradually lost market share to more aggressively expanding competitors. However, Korbit maintains strong compliance records and banking relationships, making it an attractive acquisition target for established financial institutions. Financial Services Convergence with Digital Assets Mirae Asset Group’s potential move into cryptocurrency exchange ownership follows similar global trends. Traditional financial institutions increasingly integrate digital asset services into their offerings. For instance, major investment banks now provide cryptocurrency custody and trading services to institutional clients. Similarly, asset managers launch blockchain-focused investment products. The reported acquisition talks coincide with South Korea’s evolving regulatory framework for digital assets. The Virtual Asset User Protection Act took effect in July 2024, establishing clearer guidelines for cryptocurrency exchanges. These regulations mandate stricter reserve requirements and enhanced consumer protection measures. Consequently, exchanges must demonstrate greater financial stability and operational transparency. South Korea’s Major Cryptocurrency Exchanges (2024 Market Data) Exchange Market Position Key Features Banking Partners Upbit Market Leader 80% volume share, Dunamu subsidiary K Bank Bithumb Second Largest Ownership transition ongoing Nonghyup Bank Coinone Third Largest Strong compliance focus Industrial Bank of Korea Korbit Fourth Largest First Korean exchange, established 2013 Shinhan Bank Expert Analysis on Market Consolidation Financial analysts observe increasing consolidation within South Korea’s cryptocurrency sector. Smaller exchanges struggle with rising compliance costs and banking relationship challenges. Meanwhile, larger players seek strategic advantages through acquisitions and partnerships. Mirae Asset Group’s potential Korbit acquisition follows this consolidation pattern precisely. Industry experts highlight several strategic benefits for Mirae Asset Group. First, acquiring an established exchange provides immediate regulatory licensing and operational infrastructure. Second, Korbit’s existing user base offers cross-selling opportunities for traditional financial products. Third, blockchain technology integration could enhance Mirae’s asset management and securities businesses. Market observers note similar movements globally. Traditional financial institutions increasingly recognize digital assets as legitimate investment classes. Consequently, acquisition activity in cryptocurrency infrastructure has accelerated worldwide. For example, several traditional finance companies acquired blockchain analytics firms and digital asset platforms recently. Regulatory Environment and Future Prospects South Korea’s regulatory landscape continues evolving for cryptocurrency markets. The Financial Services Commission implements progressively stricter oversight measures. These regulations aim to protect investors while fostering innovation. Additionally, authorities seek to prevent money laundering and ensure market stability. The potential Mirae Asset-Korbit deal would require regulatory approval from multiple agencies. First, the Fair Trade Commission must review potential antitrust implications. Second, financial authorities would assess compliance with digital asset regulations. Third, banking regulators might evaluate implications for traditional financial stability. Industry participants generally welcome institutional involvement in cryptocurrency markets. Established financial groups bring enhanced compliance frameworks and risk management practices. Furthermore, traditional finance participation could increase mainstream adoption of digital assets. However, some cryptocurrency advocates express concerns about excessive centralization. Historical Context and Market Evolution Korbit’s potential acquisition represents a full-circle moment for South Korea’s cryptocurrency industry. The exchange launched during Bitcoin’s early adoption phase in 2013. Initially, Korbit dominated the Korean market as the sole major exchange. However, competitive pressures increased as new platforms entered the market. NXC Corporation, Korbit’s majority shareholder, originally acquired its stake in 2017. The gaming conglomerate sought diversification into emerging technology sectors. Similarly, SK Planet’s minority investment reflected strategic positioning in digital innovation. Now, both shareholders reportedly consider divesting their positions to specialized financial institutions. Market analysts identify several factors driving current consolidation trends. First, regulatory compliance costs increased substantially following recent legislation. Second, banking relationships became more challenging for pure-play cryptocurrency businesses. Third, institutional investors demand greater stability from service providers. Conclusion Mirae Asset Group’s reported discussions to acquire Korbit cryptocurrency exchange signal accelerating convergence between traditional finance and digital assets. This potential transaction, valued between $72.5 million and $101.4 million, could reshape South Korea’s cryptocurrency landscape significantly. Furthermore, the deal demonstrates increasing institutional acceptance of blockchain technology and digital asset markets. As regulatory frameworks mature globally, similar acquisitions will likely continue transforming cryptocurrency infrastructure. The Mirae Asset-Korbit negotiations ultimately reflect broader financial sector evolution toward integrated digital asset services. FAQs Q1: What is Mirae Asset Group’s reported interest in Korbit? Mirae Asset Group, through its affiliate Mirae Asset Consulting, reportedly negotiates to acquire controlling stakes in Korbit cryptocurrency exchange from major shareholders NXC Corporation and SK Planet. Q2: How significant is Korbit in South Korea’s cryptocurrency market? Korbit ranks as South Korea’s fourth-largest cryptocurrency exchange by trading volume. Historically significant as the nation’s first exchange launched in 2013, Korbit maintains strong compliance records and banking partnerships despite increased competition. Q3: What potential value does this acquisition represent? Industry estimates value the potential Korbit acquisition between 100 billion and 140 billion won, approximately $72.5 million to $101.4 million, depending on final negotiation terms and due diligence outcomes. Q4: Why would a traditional financial group acquire a cryptocurrency exchange? Traditional financial institutions increasingly recognize digital assets as legitimate investment classes. Acquiring established exchanges provides immediate regulatory licensing, operational infrastructure, and opportunities to integrate blockchain technology into traditional financial services. Q5: How does this potential acquisition fit within broader market trends? The reported Mirae Asset-Korbit discussions reflect accelerating consolidation within cryptocurrency markets globally. As regulatory compliance costs increase, smaller exchanges face challenges while larger institutions seek strategic acquisitions to enter digital asset markets efficiently. This post Mirae Asset Group’s Strategic Move: Potentially Acquiring Korbit Crypto Exchange in Transformative $100M Deal first appeared on BitcoinWorld .
Binance Drives Altcoin Pricing Amid Distrust as 2025 Megadeals Signal Growth
Binance holds market dominance despite 88% distrust from users, as 2025 crypto megadeals reached $8.6 billion, led by Coinbase, Kraken, and Ripple acquisitions boosting institutional adoption and Wall Street integration. 88% distrust Binance amid liquidity-driven altcoin price discovery risks. Coinbase, Kraken, and Ripple spearhead 2025 megadeals totaling billions. $8.6 billion deal volume per PitchBook marks [...]
2025 Market Swings: Trump-Linked Cryptos Collapse as Bitcoin Ends in Red
The Trump-linked crypto collapse in 2025 saw tokens like Donald Trump's memecoin drop over 80% from peaks, Melania's nearly 99%, and others like WLFI and American Bitcoin sink similarly, as initial hype faded without sustained demand, per CoinGecko data. Trump memecoin: Lost 80%+ from launch high by December. Melania token plummeted nearly 99% amid rapid [...]
Defense, gold, Korean stocks, and Japan’s bond market all broke records in 2025
2025 was packed with high-stakes bets that turned fast and often without warning, forcing traders from Tokyo to New York to watch the most extreme markets swing + extreme gains in history. We saw mortgage giants behaved like meme stocks, and a standard carry trade collapsed instantly. Trump-linked crypto trades collapsed after big launches Crypto traders jumped on anything with the Trump name. Donald Trump pushed crypto hard once he retook the presidency. He placed allies in top regulatory roles and made digital coins part of his economic message. Hours before being sworn in, he launched his own memecoin and posted it online. Melania Trump followed with her own token. Later, World Liberty Financial, tied to the Trump family, released the WLFI token for public trading. In September, Eric Trump launched American Bitcoin, a crypto miner that listed via merger. Every launch started with a rally. Every single one collapsed. As of December 23, Trump’s token had lost over 80% from its peak. Melania’s dropped nearly 99%, based on CoinGecko numbers. American Bitcoin sank 80% from its September high. The excitement didn’t hold. Bitcoin itself is closing the year in the red after falling from October highs. Scion Asset Management filed paperwork on November 3 showing it held put options against Nvidia and Palantir. Michael Burry, known from The Big Short , was behind the trade. He targeted two companies at the heart of the AI-driven rally. Nvidia’s strike price was 47% under its market value. Palantir’s was 76% under. The filing only showed the portfolio as of September 30. It’s not clear if Burry still held the puts, or if it was part of a bigger plan. But AI investors had been nervous already. Burry’s move added fuel. Nvidia fell. So did Palantir. Nasdaq dropped with them. Later, they rebounded. Burry shared on X that he paid $1.84 for Palantir puts. Those contracts surged up to 101% in under three weeks. The trade put a spotlight on how much money had piled into just a few AI names. Even without full details, it rattled the tech-heavy market. Defense, gold, Korean stocks, and Japan’s bond market all broke records Trump’s choice to cut U.S. funding for Ukraine pushed European countries to act fast. Rheinmetall AG in Germany gained 150% by December. Leonardo SpA in Italy rose more than 90%. Defense stocks became hot again. Pierre Alexis Dumont, chief investment officer at Sycomore Asset Management, said, “We had taken defense out of our ESG funds until the beginning of this year. There was a change of paradigm.” Dumont said they were now investing in defensive weapons. The rally reached across industries — goggles, chemicals, even printers. A Bloomberg basket of European defense stocks jumped 70% for the year. Firms with loose ties to defense got new credit offers. Banks created “European Defence Bonds,” which were like green bonds but aimed at weapons makers. Defense spending became politically acceptable again. In October, another wave hit. The U.S. entered its longest government shutdown. Debt worries soared. Investors ran from the dollar and jumped into crypto and gold. Both hit record highs that month. The trade got nicknamed the “debasement trade.” Traders believed currencies were losing value, and they looked for shelter. But it didn’t last. Bitcoin fell again. The dollar regained ground. Treasuries turned out to be one of the year’s best performers. Gold stayed strong. Other metals like copper, aluminum, and silver jumped too, but not just from inflation fears. Trump’s tariffs and global demand shifts helped drive prices up. Gold kept climbing to new highs, even as crypto cooled off. South Korea’s stock market also broke expectations. President Lee Jae Myung had a target: get the KOSPI index to 5000. By December 22, it was up more than 70% for the year. Wall Street started to agree the goal could happen in 2026. The global AI wave brought money into Korean equities. JPMorgan and Citigroup both backed the possibility. But Korean retail investors weren’t convinced. Lee, a former retail investor himself, couldn’t win them over. They sold Korean stocks and sent $33 billion into U.S. assets. Some bought crypto. Others bought risky exchange-traded funds. That outflow weakened the won. The rally looked good on paper. But inside Korea, faith was still missing. Jim Chanos and Michael Saylor went head-to-head in a public clash. Chanos shorted Strategy Inc., a company loaded with Bitcoin. He said its value didn’t match its crypto holdings. In May, he went long on Bitcoin and short on Strategy. Saylor fired back in June on Bloomberg TV, saying, “I don’t think he understands what our business model is.” Chanos clapped back on X, calling Saylor’s comments “complete financial gibberish.” Strategy shares peaked in July with a 57% year-to-date gain. But then Bitcoin fell. New digital asset treasury firms crowded the space. Strategy dropped. From May to November 7, when Chanos said he closed the trade, shares had plunged 42%. The premium collapsed. The bet worked. Japan finally saw its “widowmaker” trade pay off. For years, traders shorted Japanese government bonds expecting yields to rise. It never worked. Until now. In 2025, Japan hiked rates. Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi approved major spending. The 10-year JGB yield passed 2%. The 30-year yield reached an all-time high. A Bloomberg index tracking JGBs dropped over 6%, making Japan the worst-performing bond market this year. Claim your free seat in an exclusive crypto trading community - limited to 1,000 members.
This New $0.035 Crypto Is Positioning for Long-Term Growth, Investors Rush as Phase 6 is Over 99%
In DeFi, growth rarely starts with hype. It usually starts much earlier, when the underlying infrastructure is quietly put in place. Protocols that last tend to build liquidity systems, risk controls, and usage logic long before wider attention arrives. By the time headlines follow, the foundation is already set. One new crypto appears to have just crossed that invisible line where infrastructure readiness begins to attract broader interest. Why Infrastructure Always Comes Before Price Expansion Lending protocols are not simple applications. They require careful design before real adoption can begin. Interest rate models must respond to market demand. Risk parameters must protect lenders and borrowers. Liquidation systems must work even during sharp price swings. Without these pieces, usage cannot scale safely. Because of this, price often lags progress. Early stages are spent building systems rather than attracting attention. Once those systems are in place, participation usually increases. Only after that does broader visibility arrive. This pattern has repeated across many DeFi crypto projects over the years. What Mutuum Finance (MUTM) Has Already Put in Place Mutuum Finance is a new cryptocurrency designed around lending and borrowing. The protocol uses a dual market structure that supports different user needs within one system. On one side, there are pooled lending markets. Users supply assets into shared pools and receive mtTokens in return. These mtTokens represent their position and grow as borrowers pay interest. This creates a simple way to earn yield without active management. On the other side, there are direct borrowing markets. Borrowers can take loans against collateral with defined Loan to Value limits. Lower risk assets support higher LTVs, while more volatile assets use tighter limits. Liquidation rules are built in to protect the protocol if collateral values fall. How Infrastructure Progress Shows Up in Participation When infrastructure is close to ready, participation usually increases quietly. This can be seen in steady growth rather than sudden spikes. Mutuum Finance has raised about $19.45M so far and has attracted more than 18,650 holders. These numbers matter because they signal engagement. A growing holder base often forms before wider market attention. Funding totals also show confidence from participants who are committing capital ahead of full utility. Rather than explosive inflows, the pace has been consistent. In many DeFi projects, this phase comes just before usage goes live and attention accelerates. Supply Positioning as Infrastructure Meets Demand Token structure also plays a role in this stage. Mutuum Finance has a total supply of 4B tokens. Of that supply, 45.5% is allocated for early distribution, which equals roughly 1.82B tokens. Around 825M tokens have already been sold. The current token price is $0.035. Since early 2025, the token has climbed about 250% from its initial stage. Phase 6 is now over 99% allocated, meaning most of the supply for this stage has already been distributed. This matters because supply often tightens once infrastructure is ready. Early stages distribute tokens widely. Later stages see fewer tokens available at the same price, just as interest begins to rise. Security as the Final Infrastructure Layer Security is often the last major checkpoint before broader adoption. For lending protocols, this step is critical. Mutuum Finance has completed a CertiK audit with a 90/100 token scan score. This helps validate the token design and basic contract structure. In addition, Halborn Security is reviewing the lending and borrowing contracts. According to official updates, the code is finalized and under formal analysis. A $50k bug bounty has also been launched to identify any remaining issues. For many serious users, these layers of review are required before participation increases. Security completion often marks the transition from development to readiness. Why Attention Is Catching Up Now With infrastructure largely in place, attention tends to follow. Mutuum Finance has announced its V1 lending and borrowing protocol for the Sepolia testnet in Q4 2025. Initial assets will include ETH and USDT for lending, borrowing, and collateral use. Additional features are also drawing interest. The protocol runs a 24 hour leaderboard that rewards the top daily contributor with $500 in MUTM. Card payment options are available, lowering friction for new participants. As Phase 6 allocation tightens and V1 approaches, some market commentators suggest Mutuum Finance is entering the stage where attention begins to align with progress. In DeFi, this moment is often when infrastructure turns into visibility, and when a new crypto starts appearing more frequently in discussions about top crypto opportunities for long-term growth. For more information about Mutuum Finance (MUTM) visit the links below: Website: https://www.mutuum.com Linktree: https://linktr.ee/mutuumfinance
Bitcoin needs a 6.24% rally to close 2025 in the green: Analyst
Many analysts previously forecast that Bitcoin would hit a price target between $180,000-$250,000 in 2025, but the price has fallen flat.
Trump SEC Shift May Ease Oversight on Crypto and Stablecoins
The Trump administration's crypto regulation approach has reduced SEC enforcement by dropping 60% of cases against crypto firms, launched a dedicated Crypto Task Force, and issued an executive order prioritizing blockchain innovation, fostering a more business-friendly environment since January 2025. SEC dismisses 60% of crypto enforcement cases, pausing actions against major players like Coinbase and [...]
VC Hype Bubble Bursts as 2025 Crypto Projects Sink Below Valuations
Crypto venture capital firms poured billions into early-stage tokens during 2025’s risk-on rebound, but many of those bets are now trading far below their headline fundraising values. The growing gap between private funding numbers and public market caps highlights a market reset after narrative-driven optimism cooled. Data recently shared by CryptoRank shows dozens of well-funded projects losing hundreds of millions, and in some cases nearly all, of their implied value once tokens reached open markets, raising fresh questions about pricing discipline during bull cycles. VC Valuations Meet Public Market Reality CryptoRank’s comparison of VC valuations versus current market capitalizations painted a stark picture. Humanity Protocol, once priced at a $1 billion valuation during private rounds, now sits at around $285 million. Plasma and ICNT show smaller gaps by comparison, with Plasma at roughly $224 million versus a $500 million valuation, and ICNT near $247 million against $470 million. The steepest drops are harder to ignore. Fuel Network, Double Zero, and Bubblemaps, which recently mocked American rapper Soulja Boy over his past involvement in crypto and NFT promotions, each carried billion- or near-billion-dollar valuations yet are now trading around $11 million, $373,000, and $6 million, respectively. Camp Network and TreeHouse followed a similar path, falling from $400 million valuations to around $15 million and $16 million. Privasea also stood out, dropping from $180 million to about $1 million. However, other projects have shown more modest declines. For example, Sosovalue has held up relatively well at around $152 million compared to a $200 million valuation, while Yieldbasis is trading near $34 million against a $50 million initial valuation. Meanwhile, Momentum and Bitlight sit closer to the middle, with market caps of around $43 million and $34 million after funding rounds that priced them at $100 million and $170 million. Funding Rebounds, but Caution Replaces Euphoria This valuation reset has come even with overall VC activity picking up again in 2025. Data from CryptoRank shows quarterly crypto venture investment climbing to about $10 billion in Q2 2025, the strongest level since early 2022. Additionally, funding remained elevated at nearly $8 billion in both Q3 and Q4. By contrast, funding during the bear market years fell steadily, bottoming near $689 million in Q3 2023 before stabilizing between $1 billion and $2.5 billion through most of 2024. The 2025 recovery closely tracked Bitcoin’s price climb above $126,000 mid-year before easing toward the $80,000 to $100,000 range by year-end. What stands out is not just the size of the rebound but also its timing. The largest capital deployment came during Q2 2025, when sentiment was strongest and token prices were rising quickly. Many of the projects now trading well below VC marks were funded during this window, according to CryptoRank data. For many investors, the takeaway is not that venture capital has returned, but that public markets are less willing to accept private round narratives at face value. As several analysts on X noted, the gap between VC pricing and live trading data has become a risk signal rather than a badge of confidence, reinforcing the need for sober expectations as capital flows back into crypto. The post VC Hype Bubble Bursts as 2025 Crypto Projects Sink Below Valuations appeared first on CryptoPotato .
Dogecoin Shows On-Chain Accumulation Signs Amid Rising Social Buzz
Dogecoin is undergoing a network-wide accumulation phase amid rising social media engagement, with Santiment data showing increased Mean Coin Age and subdued Age Consumed metrics. Despite bearish price action near $0.122-$0.133, on-chain signals suggest fading sell pressure and holder accumulation. Santiment reports Dogecoin leading crypto social media buzz alongside Bitcoin, Ethereum, and ZCash. Reddit sweepstakes [...]
SEC's revised audit inspection standards expected to trickle down to crypto firms
The Trump administration’s crypto-friendly approach has resulted in reduced oversight of the crypto industry, leading to criticism from advocates and lawmakers. The SEC has changed its policies from strict enforcement of regulations to a business-friendly model in President Trump’s regime, and contrary to critics, the reduced oversight has not been unreasonably reserved for crypto firms. The crypto regulatory environment under Trump’s administration Since President Donald Trump took office in January 2025, the Securities and Exchange Commission has dropped or paused approximately 60% of the enforcement cases it had against crypto companies, according to reports from The New York Times. On January 21, the SEC announced a new Crypto Task Force led by Commissioner Hester Peirce, which was created to develop clear regulatory rules for the industry. Just three days later, Trump issued an executive order that reversed the policies former President Biden put in place. President Trump’s order was titled “Strengthening American Leadership in Digital Financial Technology.” It established a Presidential Working Group on Digital Asset Markets and showed that blockchain innovation is a national priority. The SEC has since dismissed lawsuits against major exchanges such as Coinbase and Kraken without penalties. According to reports , the SEC is no longer actively pursuing any cases against firms with known ties to Trump. The Justice Department has reacted similarly, dismantling its National Cryptocurrency Enforcement Team in April and redirecting resources toward other priorities like immigration enforcement and drug trafficking. In April, Trump appointed Paul Atkins, a former commissioner known for opposing regulatory overreach, as SEC Chair. At the AICPA Conference on Current SEC and PCAOB Developments in December, Atkins criticized recent disclosure rules pushed by his predecessor Gary Gensler, saying they would have undermined traditional financial accounting standards. The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB), which oversees auditors of public companies, has also reduced its inspections and enforcement actions and refrained from setting new standards ever since the appointment of William Duhnke as PCAOB chairman by President Trump. Robert Pawlewicz, an accounting professor at the University of Richmond, told CFO Dive that the administration doesn’t need to abolish the PCAOB to make it ineffective. He expects that inspections and enforcement will continue to decrease like they did during Trump’s first term. In April 2025, the House Financial Services Committee even voted to advance a bill that would abolish the PCAOB entirely, though the bill has not become law. The PCAOB previously identified crypto assets as a priority for inspections in 2025, especially organizations with material crypto holdings and significant crypto transactions, but with Atkins now overseeing the SEC, which in turn oversees the PCAOB, these inspections seem uncertain. Atkins previously criticized the PCAOB, saying its rules interfered with audit firms’ judgment. He went on to criticize the board’s budget and salaries. What does this mean for crypto investors and companies? For crypto companies, the regulatory environment has become significantly more welcoming. In February, the SEC revamped its Crypto Assets and Cyber Unit into the broader Cyber and Emerging Technologies Unit with about 30 fraud specialists. Acting SEC Chairman Mark Uyeda state d th e unit will protect investors and also facilitate innovation. In July, Trump signed the GENIUS Act into law, establishing the first comprehensive federal framework for stablecoins. Under the Aact, stablecoin issuers must keep enough money in reserve to back every coin they issue, submit monthly audits to prove it, and follow anti-money laundering laws. The House also passed a separate bill called the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act with support from both political parties. Advocates and lawmakers like Senator Elizabeth Warren have criticized the sudden regulatory changes. Senator Warren called for an SEC Inspector General investigation in early 2025 to determine whether Trump administration officials improperly influenced SEC decisions on cryptocurrency because Trump, his advisors, and family members all stand to benefit from developments in the crypto industry. Public Citizen and other advocacy groups believ e th e SEC changed its approach due to an investment of nearly $250 million from companies like Coinbase, Ripple, and Andreessen Horowitz into various 2024 campaigns. Despite the controversy, the Trump administration has admitted no wrongdoing. The SEC told The New York Times that political favoritism had nothing to do with its strategies and that the changes were based on legal and policy reasons. Get seen where it counts. Advertise in Cryptopolitan Research and reach crypto’s sharpest investors and builders.
Court Scrutiny of Solana MEV Practices Raises Questions About “Fair Launch” Claims
A U.S. federal court has stepped into a growing dispute over fairness in the Solana memecoin market, drawing sharp attention to Pump.fun. The platform, known for rapid and open token launches, now sits at the center of a class-action lawsuit focused on transaction ordering and MEV tools. Significantly, the court recently allowed thousands of internal messages from a whistleblower into the record, signaling that the claims warrant serious examination. While the ruling does not establish wrongdoing, it pushes the case beyond speculation and into formal legal scrutiny, with potential consequences for the wider crypto ecosystem. How MEV Shifted the Fair Launch Debate Pump.fun built its reputation on equal access. It removed presales, private rounds, and early allocations, creating confidence among retail traders. However, the lawsuit argues that fairness at the interface level does not ensure fairness in execution. Blockchains process transactions through validators, mempools, and priority fees, not simple button clicks. Consequently, traders with faster infrastructure and MEV bots can reach the front of blocks, even during public launches. Additionally, newly launched tokens on Pump.fun start with thin liquidity and sharp bonding curves. Early execution can dramatically change prices within seconds. Plaintiffs claim that sophisticated traders exploited this structure by securing priority ordering, buying at lower prices, and exiting quickly. Retail users, meanwhile, often entered later at inflated levels, believing they remained early participants. Why the Case Targets More Than Pump.fun The lawsuit expands beyond Pump.fun to include Solana Labs, the Solana Foundation, and Jito Labs. Plaintiffs argue that MEV advantages arise from infrastructure decisions, not just application design. Validators determine transaction order, while MEV tools optimize execution speed. Hence, responsibility may extend to entities that build and promote these systems. Jito Labs receives particular attention due to its role in MEV optimization on Solana. Moreover, Solana’s core organizations face scrutiny for promoting ecosystem growth while allegedly knowing about structural disadvantages facing retail users. If proven, this could reshape how blockchains communicate risk and fairness to users. Broader Implications for Retail Trust The lawsuit cites estimated retail losses between $4.4 billion and $5.5 billion, though courts have not verified these figures. Still, the scale underscores rising concern about systemic inequality in crypto markets. Significantly, the case challenges whether public access alone defines fairness.
Peter Schiff Says Silver Breaks $100 Next Year Despite Possible Sharp Pullbacks
Silver is poised for a historic run above $100 next year as macro stress, rising deficits, and tight supply fuel an explosive bull case that could redefine the metal’s long-term value, Peter Schiff says. Silver Set to Clear $100 Next Year Despite Macro Volatility, Peter Schiff Says Economist and gold advocate Peter Schiff shared on
BubbleMaps Raises Insider Manipulation Concerns for Atlas Token After Whale Insider Promo
BubbleMaps analysis reveals potential insider manipulation in the Atlas token, a memecoin tied to Vice President JD Vance’s pet dog. Sixty-eight coordinated wallets control 47% of the supply, valued at about $1 million, emerging right after Whale Insider’s promotion to over 625,000 followers. 68 wallets exhibit coordinated behavior, holding 47% of Atlas token supply. Funded [...]
Memecoin inspired by JD Vance's pet dog draws red flag from analysts
Blockchain analytics platform BubbleMaps has raised serious concerns about potential insider manipulation in the Atlas token, a memecoin inspired by Vice President JD Vance’s pet dog, after the cryptocurrency was promoted to hundreds of thousands of followers by the influential account Whale Insider. Most influencer-driven memecoin launches have turned out to be rug pull scam projects, while a few have burned out. Despite the daily churn of memes, crypto influencers still have a lot of pull when it comes to pushing narratives and directing investors to projects. That was the case with Atlas token, reportedly promoted by Whale Insider. BubbleMaps revealed that 68 wallets with coordinated behavior patterns now control nearly half of the token’s supply, valued at roughly $1 million. On December 26, Whale Insider posted to its more than 625,000 followers that the Atlas token had risen 100% in the previous 24 hours. However, BubbleMaps’ subsequent analysis uncovered what the analytics firm described as a “heavily bundled” token launch with hallmarks of insider coordination. Is the Atlas meme controlled by insiders? According to BubbleMaps, the 68 suspicious wallets were funded through ChangeNow, a non-custodial cryptocurrency exchange that does not require know-your-customer verification for most transactions. The wallets exhibited signs of coordinated control, including no prior on-chain activity before the Atlas launch; they were funded within tight time windows, received similar amounts of ETH, and sniped the token by purchasing immediately at launch. These wallets reportedly hold 47% of the Atlas supply, raising concerns about potential price manipulation and coordinated selling that could harm retail investors who bought the token based on Whale Insider’s promotion. BubbleMaps calls out pattern of influencer-promoted launches ZachXBT, a crypto scam investigator and advisor at Paradigm, has over the years exposed crypto influencers who get paid to promote crypto projects, such as memecoins, but fail to disclose that the promotional posts are advertisements. BubbleMaps’ post could be implying that the Atlas post by the Whale Insider account may be one of such instances where influencers promote newly launched tokens without disclosure of insider holdings or coordinated launch tactics. This was not the first time BubbleMaps called out Whale Insider for promoting controversial tokens. The memecoin market experienced explosive growth in 2024, especially with memecoin launchpads like Pump.fun gaining traction and making memecoin launches seamless. However, this growth has also come with more scams and projects that ended as rug pulls. Influencers, including celebrity musicians, artists, and politicians, have also launched memecoins that have crashed, leaving investors at a loss. Earlier this year, tokens such as TRUMP and MELANIA were launched by individuals reportedly associated with the President of the United States and the First Lady, all of which came crashing within a week or two after launch. Argentine President Javier Milei promoted the LIBRA token , which turned out to be a scam. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has previously taken action against celebrity promoters who failed to disclose payments for endorsing cryptocurrency investments. However, the same SEC posted in February 2025 that “a meme coin does not constitute any of the common financial instruments specifically enumerated in the definition of ‘security,’” adding that “neither meme coin purchasers nor holders are protected by the federal securities laws.” Don’t just read crypto news. Understand it. Subscribe to our newsletter. It's free .
Elon Musk’s Grok Predicts XRP Price for January 2026
As 2025 winds down, XRP has entered a prolonged period of calm, trading within a tight range while investors await clearer directional signals. With price action muted and volatility compressed, attention has shifted to predictive models for clues about what lies ahead. To gain insight, we analyzed a forecast generated by Grok, the AI model integrated into Elon Musk’s X platform , alongside broader market data and analyst expectations. Grok’s Data-Driven Outlook for January 2026 Grok’s assessment is firmly rooted in quantitative analysis rather than speculation. Based on XRP’s current price of approximately $1.87 and an ARIMA model applied to the past year of daily price data, the AI projects that XRP will remain largely stable in January 2026. The forecast predicts an average price of around $1.87, with only minor fluctuations between $1.86 and $1.88, assuming no major macroeconomic or cryptocurrency-specific disruptions. This projection reflects a market that has already priced in known variables, including regulatory developments and recent adoption trends. From Grok’s perspective, XRP’s ongoing consolidation is not a sign of weakness but evidence of equilibrium between buyers and sellers. Conservative Analyst Expectations Align Closely Several independent analyst models broadly support Grok’s neutral stance. XRP is forecast to trade between $1.79 and $2.08 in January 2026, with an average price of $1.86. These estimates are informed by technical indicators showing elevated volatility, measured at roughly 5.6%, and a market sentiment index still hovering in extreme fear territory. We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1 — TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025 Some analysts anticipate a slight dip toward $1.85 later in the month, citing bearish momentum signals and the absence of immediate bullish catalysts. These projections show short-term caution, but no structural downside risk. Moderate Bullish Scenarios Beyond January Looking slightly further ahead, more balanced bullish forecasts envision XRP trading between $2.57 and $2.69 in early 2026. These outlooks are based on assumptions of modest annual growth, driven by clearer regulatory frameworks and gradual institutional adoption rather than sudden hype-driven moves. Such scenarios depend on measurable progress in XRP’s real-world utility, particularly in cross-border payments and regulated financial infrastructure. High-Conviction Catalysts and Long-Term Upside More aggressive projections, extending toward the end of 2026, tie XRP’s potential upside to major catalysts. Analysts in this camp argue that additional spot XRP ETF approvals and inflows approaching $10 billion could create supply-demand imbalances, pushing prices into the $6 to $14 range. What the Data Ultimately Suggests Taken together, Grok’s forecast and corroborating analyst data point to stability as XRP enters January 2026. While the long-term upside remains possible, the most evidence-based outlook suggests that XRP will begin the year consolidating near its current levels, awaiting a decisive catalyst to define its next major trend. Disclaimer : This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are urged to do in-depth research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses. Follow us on Twitter , Facebook , Telegram , and Google News The post Elon Musk’s Grok Predicts XRP Price for January 2026 appeared first on Times Tabloid .
Michael Saylor Signals New Bitcoin Moves as 2025 Predictions Dive
Saylor's "Back to Orange" hints at Strategy possibly restarting Bitcoin purchases. Bitcoin's chance to hit $100K by 2025's end stands around 1% in predictions. Continue Reading: Michael Saylor Signals New Bitcoin Moves as 2025 Predictions Dive The post Michael Saylor Signals New Bitcoin Moves as 2025 Predictions Dive appeared first on COINTURK NEWS .
Dogecoin buzz returns, price stays weak – Traders, watch THIS level closely
The Net Unrealized Profit/Loss metric showed a capitulation phase underway for the memecoin.
The 11 Big Trades of 2025: Bubbles, Cockroaches, and a 367% Jump
It was another year of high-conviction bets — and fast reversals.
Hyperliquid Reports $844M 2025 Revenue, 600K Users as Bitcoin Leads Trading
Hyperliquid generated $844 million in revenue in 2025, achieved $2.95 trillion in total trading volume, and added over 600,000 new users. Perpetual contracts dominated fees at $848.33 million, with Bitcoin leading trading at $1.16 trillion. Hyperliquid 2025 revenue hit $844 million from $2.95T trading volume. Averaged $8.34 billion daily volume with 561.7 million transactions per [...]
January Rate Cut Odds Rise to 17.7% as FedWatch Tracks Market Shift
Market expectations for U.S. monetary policy shifted modestly ahead of the Federal Reserve’s January meeting, according to CME FedWatch data. Futures pricing showed a 17.7% probability of a rate cut to the 325–350 basis point range, while traders still assigned an 82.3% probability that the Fed will keep rates unchanged at 350–375 basis points. No probability priced in a rate hike. Fed Rate Cut Probabilities. Source: CME FedWatch The change reflects repositioning in Fed funds futures rather than a policy signal from the central bank. FedWatch probabilities are derived directly from futures contracts, which react quickly to incoming macro data, market volatility, and shifts in risk appetite. As a result, small changes in pricing can produce visible swings in implied probabilities. Although the base case remains no change, the presence of a measurable cut probability highlights growing debate over the Fed’s next move. Traders continue to weigh cooling inflation trends against still-resilient labor market data, keeping expectations fluid into early 2026. Futures Pricing Shows Market Caution The January contract tied to the meeting, ZQF6, showed a mid-price of 96.3650, with notable trading activity and open interest remaining elevated. That positioning suggests markets remain sensitive to any data that could tilt expectations further toward easing or reinforce the hold narrative. Historically, the Fed has been cautious at turning points. In prior cycles, policymakers often waited for sustained confirmation from inflation and employment before initiating cuts. This pattern has kept traders reluctant to fully price aggressive easing, even as growth indicators soften. As a result, the January meeting appears framed as a checkpoint rather than a pivot. Futures markets currently signal limited conviction either way, with traders keeping optionality rather than betting heavily on a single outcome. Crypto Markets React to Policy Signals Digital asset markets showed a measured response as FedWatch probabilities updated. Bitcoin and Ether traded slightly higher during the session, reflecting sensitivity to rate expectations but without sharp follow-through. The muted move suggested traders treated the probability shift as incremental rather than decisive. Crypto assets have often responded to changes in rate expectations, as lower policy rates can ease financial conditions and support risk assets. However, with no clear policy change priced as the dominant outcome, reactions remained contained. Past cycles show that clearer momentum in crypto typically follows decisive moves in rate pricing rather than marginal probability changes. Until futures markets show stronger conviction, digital assets may continue to track broader macro signals without a sustained directional move.
Bitcoin to $10,000? Bloomberg Makes Shocking Crash Prediction
Bloomberg's McGlone believes that Bitcoin could potentially lose 90% of its peak value to hit that $10,000 target.
Ethereum Is Stuck — and 2026 Could Decide What Happens Next
Ethereum keeps grinding sideways, with weekly support holding but no clear breakout yet. Analysts say the next move likely depends on how ETH reacts at the major zones into 2026. Ethereum Weekly Chart Flags 2026 Decision Zone After Support Holds Ethereum traded near $2,947 on the weekly ETHUSD chart as a market update from More Crypto Online said price still sits close to a larger structural support zone. The analyst said an upside response remains possible from this area, while warning that the market could still print one more low early next year before choosing a clearer direction. Ethereum Weekly Elliott Wave Zones. Source: TradingView, More Crypto Online The chart highlights a support band around $2,618, $2,252, and $1,818, levels shown as key Fibonacci references on the weekly structure. In the same view, Ethereum also sits below a nearby resistance cluster marked around $3,348 to $4,619, which frames the first major area price would need to reclaim to shift the broader setup. Looking into 2026, the More Crypto Online post said the most important reference remains the resistance zone above, because the market’s reaction there would decide which larger scenario takes control. The analyst said both primary scenarios remain structurally valid for now, and the chart does not yet confirm that Ethereum has made its final decision. The update added that probabilities will shift only when price action confirms behavior at the major zones. Instead of calling a direction today, the analyst said the current structure mainly defines conditions that could guide the next move as the market approaches 2026. Source: More Crypto Online on X, TradingView chart screenshot. Ethereum Holds Range as 2026 Nears, Ted Pillows Says Ethereum stayed range bound on the daily ETH/USDT chart after failing to reclaim higher resistance bands marked on the setup shared by Ted Pillows. The post said ETH “has gone almost nowhere since yesterday,” while price hovered around the $2,940 area on Binance. Ethereum Range Zones on ETH USDT Daily Chart. Source: Ted Pillows The chart shows multiple overhead supply zones, with the nearest resistance bands drawn around the low $3,000s and another higher band near the mid $3,000s. At the same time, the lower green support zone sits below current price, stretching toward the high $2,000s and lower, which frames the downside area traders often watch if the range breaks. Ted Pillows said Ethereum remains “stuck in a range” and suggested major volatility may not arrive until 2026 begins. The same chart maps several potential paths, including a push into resistance, a pullback to support, or continued sideways movement, while price remains trapped between the marked zones.
Flow Rollback Plan Draws deBridge Criticism Over Potential Greater Damage
The Flow network rollback, proposed after a December 26 exploit, draws sharp criticism from deBridge co-founder Alex Smirnov, who warns it risks greater financial harm to honest users, bridges, and partners than the original attack by creating doubled balances and reimbursement issues without impacting the attacker, who already bridged out $4 million. Smirnov claims no [...]
Robinhood Hands Out $750K in Bitcoin as BTC Shows Signs of a Base
Robinhood distributed $750,000 in Bitcoin during a holiday promotion as BTC traded in a tight daily range. Meanwhile, chart analysts flagged early signs of stabilization after a prolonged pullback. Robinhood Distributes $750,000 in Bitcoin Through Holiday Promotion Robinhood distributed a total of $750,000 worth of Bitcoin to eligible users as part of a limited holiday promotion, according to details shared by the company. The giveaway took place during “HOOD Holidays” Day 2 and formed one part of a multi-day rewards campaign. Under the promotion’s structure, users who did not receive top prizes instead shared a fixed Bitcoin pool worth $750,000. The platform split the amount on a pro-rata basis among qualifying participants rather than issuing equal payouts to all users. As a result, individual Bitcoin rewards varied depending on participation and eligibility. Meanwhile, the campaign also included separate prize tiers unrelated to the Bitcoin pool. These featured non-crypto rewards such as travel packages and physical prizes, which Robinhood awarded independently from the Bitcoin distribution. The company positioned the promotion as a seasonal engagement effort rather than a permanent rewards program. At the same time, Robinhood did not disclose how many users qualified for the Bitcoin pool or the average payout per participant. However, the structure confirms that the $750,000 figure refers to the total Bitcoin allocated for the shared distribution, not a direct grant to each user. The promotion comes as U.S.-based trading platforms continue to use short-term incentives to drive user activity, especially around year-end periods marked by lower trading volumes and heightened competition among retail brokerages. Bitcoin Chart Signals Draw Attention as Analysts Point to Potential Base Meanwhile, Bitcoin traded in a narrow range on the daily chart as technical analysts highlighted a possible base forming after weeks of downside pressure. A chart shared by market commentator Gem Detecter showed BTC/USDT consolidating inside a tightening structure, following a broader downtrend marked by a series of lower highs and lower lows. Bitcoin TetherUS Daily Chart. Source: X The chart outlines a compressed price range where selling momentum has slowed, with candles clustering near recent lows. According to the analysis, this type of structure often appears after extended declines, when volatility contracts and price action stabilizes. The setup followed several failed rebound attempts earlier in the quarter, each capped by descending resistance. At the same time, the analyst described the pattern as a “clear bottom signal,” while framing the view as a longer term outlook rather than a near term move. In a social media post, Gem Detecter said 2026 could mark a strong year for Bitcoin and the broader altcoin market, linking that view to the current technical structure. Market data shows Bitcoin remained well below its previous highs, reflecting caution across spot and derivatives markets. While some traders view the consolidation as early base building, others continue to watch for confirmation through volume expansion or a decisive break from the current range. For now, price action remains contained, with the chart reflecting consolidation rather than a confirmed trend reversal.
U.S. Crypto Bills in 2025 Reshape Regulation, Stablecoins, and CBDC Policy
U.S. lawmakers moved digital asset policy into a new phase in 2025, passing a set of crypto bills that signaled long-term regulatory commitment. Congress framed the effort as a shift from enforcement-first actions toward clear federal rules. The push focused on stablecoins, market structure, and limits on a potential U.S. central bank digital currency. The effort unfolded during a coordinated legislative push often described by lawmakers as “Crypto Week.” House leaders advanced multiple bills in parallel, while the Senate prioritized stablecoin legislation. By mid-year, the White House signed the first major crypto law, locking in a federal framework that had stalled for years. Together, the bills marked the clearest signal yet that Washington plans to keep crypto activity onshore. Lawmakers from both parties said the goal was legal certainty, not promotion, as digital assets continue to intersect with payments, banking, and capital markets. Stablecoin Law Sets Federal Baseline The centerpiece of the 2025 shift was the passage of a stablecoin bill that created national standards for payment tokens. The law requires issuers to hold high-quality liquid reserves and provide regular disclosures. It also outlines who can issue stablecoins and under what conditions. Supporters said the measure reduces risks exposed by earlier market failures. At the same time, it gives banks and regulated firms a clear path to participate. Regulators now oversee stablecoin activity through defined supervisory processes rather than ad-hoc guidance. Since the bill became law, agencies have begun outlining how institutions can apply to issue or manage stablecoins. That early follow-through has reinforced the view that Congress expects regulators to implement, not reinterpret, the statute. Market Structure and CBDC Limits Advance Alongside the stablecoin law, the House advanced a broader market structure bill designed to clarify how digital assets are classified and supervised. The proposal aims to define when tokens fall under commodities rules and how trading platforms should register and operate. Lawmakers also passed legislation restricting the Federal Reserve from issuing a retail central bank digital currency without direct congressional approval. Sponsors framed the move as a privacy safeguard rather than a rejection of digital payments. While parts of the market structure agenda may extend into 2026, the 2025 votes changed expectations. Instead of asking whether Congress will act on crypto, the focus has shifted to how quickly agencies implement the new framework and how remaining gaps will be addressed.
Ethereum Gears Up for a Monumental Leap in 2026
Ethereum's price hasn't matched increased Blockchain usage and institutional interest. Experts predict a tenfold increase in Total Value Locked by 2026. Continue Reading: Ethereum Gears Up for a Monumental Leap in 2026 The post Ethereum Gears Up for a Monumental Leap in 2026 appeared first on COINTURK NEWS .
Bitcoin ETFs See $5.5B Outflows as BlackRock Investors Accumulate
U.S. Spot Bitcoin ETFs have recorded cumulative outflows of $5.5 billion from their peak, dropping assets under management to $116.58 billion amid Bitcoin's 32% decline from $126,000. BlackRock's ETF counters this with $1.16 billion in net inflows over 12 days from steadfast investors. Cumulative Bitcoin ETF outflows reach $5.5 billion since all-time high. AUM falls [...]
1996 XRP Moment, Ripple CTO Warning and Fed 2.0 Attempt
Crypto history shows that the most transformative shifts rarely announce themselves loudly. Long before the internet reshaped global commerce, it was widely misunderstood, dismissed, and underestimated. Today, similar arguments are resurfacing around XRP, as market signals, regulatory momentum, and real-world adoption quietly converge beneath the surface. That framing was laid out by Digital Asset Investor in a detailed video shared on X, where he connected XRP’s current market behavior with deeper structural changes unfolding across finance, regulation, and blockchain infrastructure. XRP Price Levels and Quiet Accumulation Digital Asset Investor pointed to XRP trading around the $1.85 range as a psychologically important zone. Rather than expressing concern over short-term volatility, he described the price action as a potential accumulation window ahead of broader developments. In his view, temporary dips matter far less than positioning before regulatory clarity and institutional deployment arrive. 1996 XRP Moment , Ripple CTO Warning & Fed 2.0 Attempt (Includes Paid Promotion) pic.twitter.com/G11vYB2pYH — Digital Asset Investor (@digitalassetbuy) December 27, 2025 Supporting this outlook, he highlighted Switzerland’s leading retail chain, Spar, confirming XRP acceptance for payments . The move, while modest on the surface, was framed as a meaningful signal of organic adoption—real usage beginning at the edges before expanding into the core financial system. Venture Capital Tensions and Narrative Control A central argument in the video focused on why XRP and Cardano have faced sustained criticism from venture capital circles. According to Digital Asset Investor, both projects deviated from traditional VC-driven token distribution models that prioritize early insider access and post-launch exits. As a result, he argued, they were excluded from the narrative protection often afforded to other networks. He contrasted this with what he described as coordinated promotion across Ethereum, Bitcoin, and Solana ecosystems, suggesting much of crypto’s perceived consensus is shaped by paid media and influencer pipelines rather than neutral assessment. Controlled Decentralization and Regulatory Reality Digital Asset Investor also challenged the idea that extreme decentralization was ever compatible with global finance. He argued that regulatory involvement was inevitable and that success would come from “controlled decentralization,” where blockchain networks operate within defined legal frameworks while preserving efficiency and neutrality. We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1 — TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025 In this context, Ripple’s long-term strategy was likened to building railroad infrastructure—slow, capital-intensive, and often overlooked until the system becomes indispensable. Unlike networks focused on speculative applications, Ripple’s emphasis has remained on payments, liquidity, and institutional interoperability. Ripple CTO Warning and Infrastructure Risks Adding urgency to the discussion, Digital Asset Investor referenced a recent warning from Ripple CTO David Schwartz . Schwartz cautioned crypto wallet providers against mandatory firmware updates, noting that forced updates can place users under pressure and increase security risks. The comment reinforced Ripple’s focus on cautious, user-centric infrastructure design rather than rapid, disruptive changes. The “1996 Moment” Thesis Looking ahead, Digital Asset Investor tied these developments to anticipated U.S. crypto legislation, arguing that regulatory clarity could act as a catalyst similar to the late-1990s internet boom. In his view, XRP is positioned as foundational infrastructure for the “internet of money,” not a speculative trend. If history follows familiar patterns, today’s skepticism may later be remembered as the calm before a financial transformation few truly saw coming. Disclaimer : This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are urged to do in-depth research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses. Follow us on Twitter , Facebook , Telegram , and Google News The post 1996 XRP Moment, Ripple CTO Warning and Fed 2.0 Attempt appeared first on Times Tabloid .
Why is deBridge’s Smirnov concerned about Flow?
Alex Smirnov, co-founder of deBridge has pointed out some things he perceives as critical missteps as the Flow team continues to recover from the recent attack that hit its network. As part of its efforts to recover, the Flow team has suggested a rollback, which has raised eyebrows as critics like Smirnov, whose company deBridge, is integrated with Flow, claimed to have received no communication or coordination from the Flow team. This is even though Flow claimed they were synchronizing with critical partners. Why is deBridge’s Smirnov concerned about Flow? According to Smirnov, the decision to roll back has been rushed and will likely result in financial damage far exceeding the impact of the original exploit . “A rollback introduces systemic issues that affect bridges, custodians, users, and counterparties who acted honestly during the affected window,” Smirnov explained before urging all Flow validators not to validate transactions on the rolled-back chain until some crucial questions are clearly answered. One of those questions is how Flow plans to handle doubled balances for users who bridged out of Flow during the rollback window and got their balances doubled because of the revert, and how users who bridged into Flow during the rollback window will be reimbursed. Another question he wants answers to is how ecosystem custodians like LayerZero will handle cases of transactions that were executed right inside the rollback window. Smirnov highlighted similar incidents, claiming they were handled far more professionally, with the hackers getting isolated without the need for a rollback. “Why is Flow taking a different approach?” He asked. “Who specifically made the decision to roll back the chain?” Smirnov has urged Flow validators to pause nodes and halt validation until clear remediation plans have been communicated by the team, ecosystem partners have been properly coordinated and security groups like Security Alliance have been engaged. In a separate tweet, Smirnov doubled down on the futility of Flow’s solution by highlighting that the attacker has already “bridged out ~$4M and consolidated the funds at this address before moving further.” “At this stage, a rollback has zero impact on the Flow attacker and instead harms only innocent users, liquidity providers, and ecosystem partners who acted honestly during the rollback window,” he wrote . Flow claim s ro llback is the safest way to proceed According to the Flow team, it does not have any other logical way forward other than to restore the network to a checkpoint prior to the exploit. The plan is to remove unauthorized transactions from the ledger. The rollback window will cover transactions submitted between approximately 11:25 PM PST (December 26) and the network halt at 5:30 AM PST (December 27) will need to be resubmitted after the restart, including any legitimate users who the proposed remedy will inconvenience. Validators have accepted and deployed the Mainnet-28 fix, but the network is still in read-only mode for synchronization with bridges, CEXs, and DEXs to avoid state mismatches. As of December 28, synchronization has been extended to ensure all partners reset to the pre-exploit state. Want your project in front of crypto’s top minds? Feature it in our next industry report, where data meets impact.
Can’t-Miss Indie Games You Should Play From 2025
Indie developers dropped some of the year's best games, including some offbeat insta-classics. Here's what you might have missed.
Bitcoin drops 32% as ETF money exits – Yet THIS group isn’t backing off
Bitcoin ETFs record sell-off but hold firm on institutional support.
As Ethereum (ETH) Slows at $2,900 This New Cheap Crypto Climbs 250% as Tokens Run Low
Ethereum has entered a quieter phase. After months of movement, price action has slowed and many traders are reassessing where fresh momentum could come from next. This type of pause often leads investors to look beyond large caps. When upside feels limited at the top, attention shifts toward smaller assets that are earlier in their growth cycle. One new DeFi crypto has started to stand out during this rotation. Ethereum (ETH) Ethereum is currently trading around $2,900, supported by a market cap that remains one of the largest in crypto. The network continues to lead in smart contracts, DeFi, and stablecoin activity. However, price action has struggled to push cleanly above the $3,000 resistance zone. Market commentators suggest that size is now Ethereum’s main constraint. With such a large valuation, even strong demand leads to slower price movement. A move from $2,900 to $3,500 requires massive capital inflows. Because of this, some investors are exploring lower priced cryptocurrencies where smaller inflows can have a larger impact. This does not mean Ethereum is losing relevance. It means the growth profile has changed. Investors seeking higher upside potential often look for assets that are still forming their market structure. Mutuum Finance (MUTM) That search has brought attention to Mutuum Finance , a DeFi crypto focused on lending and borrowing. Mutuum Finance is building a protocol with two core markets that support different user needs. The first is a pooled lending model. Users can supply assets into shared liquidity pools and receive mtTokens in return. These mtTokens represent the supplied position and grow in value as interest accrues. For example, a user supplying ETH into the protocol receives mtETH. Over time, mtETH increases as borrowers pay interest. This creates a clear and simple yield path. The second is a peer to peer borrowing model. Here, users can borrow assets directly against collateral with defined terms. Borrow rates depend on asset type and demand. Loan to Value levels are set to manage risk. Lower volatility assets can support higher LTVs, while more volatile assets use lower LTVs. If collateral value drops too far, liquidations help protect the system. Presale Progress and Why It Matters Mutuum Finance is currently priced at $0.035. The presale began in early 2025 and has already seen the token rise 250% from its Phase 1 price of $0.01. Phase 6 is now over 99% allocated, signaling strong demand at current levels. So far, the project has raised around $19.45M and attracted more than 18,650 holders. Out of a total supply of 4B tokens, 45.5% are allocated to the presale, which equals about 1.82B tokens. Around 825M tokens have already been sold. These figures matter because they show distribution. Wide holder participation can reduce concentration risk. As supply at this price level tightens, new participants often enter at higher stages. Mutuum Finance also runs a 24 hour leaderboard that rewards the top daily contributor with $500 in MUTM. This feature encourages steady participation rather than short bursts of activity. Security Focus Builds Confidence Security is critical for any DeFi crypto, especially a lending protocol. Mutuum Finance has completed a CertiK audit with a 90/100 token scan score. This helps boost confidence around the token structure. In addition, Halborn Security is reviewing the lending and borrowing contracts. According to official updates, the code is finalized and under formal analysis. A $50k bug bounty is also active to identify vulnerabilities before broader usage. For many investors, this level of security preparation reduces uncertainty and supports long term participation. V1 Launch and Stablecoin Plans Utility activation is the next major step. Mutuum Finance has announced that V1 of its lending and borrowing protocol is planned for the Sepolia testnet in Q4 2025. Initial assets will include ETH and USDT for lending, borrowing, and collateral use. Beyond V1, the roadmap includes stablecoin integration and layer 2 expansion. Stablecoins are crucial because they support predictable borrowing demand. Layer 2 deployment can reduce fees and improve speed, making the protocol more accessible for daily use. As these pieces come together, some analysts believe Mutuum Finance could see increased activity shortly after launch. Combined with the buy and distribute mechanism, where part of protocol fees are used to buy MUTM tokens from the market, this creates ongoing demand tied to real usage rather than attention alone. Why Investors Are Watching Closely With Ethereum slowing near $2,900 and facing resistance at $3,000, many investors are asking what crypto to buy now. Lower priced assets with defined utility often move into focus during these phases. Mutuum Finance fits this profile for some market participants. It is a new crypto with a clear DeFi use case, strong presale participation, completed and ongoing audits, and an approaching V1 launch. Phase 6 supply is almost fully allocated, which adds to the sense that the current price window may be closing. In a market where large caps consolidate, this is why some see Mutuum Finance as a cheap crypto worth watching as 2026 approaches. For more information about Mutuum Finance (MUTM) visit the links below: Website: https://www.mutuum.com Linktree: https://linktr.ee/mutuumfinance
Bitcoin Spot ETFs See $782 Million Christmas Outflow, AUM Falls to $113.5B Amid Six-Day Net Decline
Bitcoin Spot ETFs See $782 Million Christmas Outflow, AUM Falls to $113.5B Amid Six-Day Net Decline
Conflux price prediction 2025-2031: Can CFX price lead China’s crypto market?
Key takeaways : Conflux price prediction shows volatility around $0.073. Considering the current BTC market sentiment and rising buying demand among investors, the CFX price will reach $0.47 in 2025. In 2031, CFX might record a maximum price of $4.15. Conflux Network (CFX) is a high-speed layer 1 blockchain that combines proof-of-work consensus with proof-of-stake finality. Originating from China, it follows local regulations, earning it the nickname “Chinese Ethereum.” The network’s native CFX token serves various purposes, such as a store of value and governance token. You can also stake these tokens to earn passive income in more CFX tokens. When considering the future value of the CFX token in 2025 and beyond, our CFX network price prediction accounts for various factors that could influence its price. Analysts question: Can CFX price reach $1? Overview Cryptocurrency Conflux Network Ticker symbol CFX Rank 107 Price $0.073 (-0.33%) Market cap $996.7 Million Circulating supply 5.11 Billion Trading volume 24h $630 Million All-time high $1.7; March 27, 2021 All-time low $0.02191; January 1, 2023 Conflux price prediction: Technical analysis Metric Value Current Price $0.073 Price Prediction $ 0.08153 (+17.90%) Fear & Greed Index 23 (Extreme Fear) Sentiment Bearish Volatility 9.13% (High) Green Days 9/30 (30%) 50-Day SMA $ 0.09580 200-Day SMA $ 0.1298 14-Day RSI 27.22 (Oversold) Conflux price analysis: CFX price faced bearish pressure below $0.073 TL;DR Breakdown: CFX price analysis shows bearish pressure toward $0.073 Resistance for CFX is at $0.0792 Support for CFX/USD is at $0.0688 The CFX price analysis for 28 December confirms that sellers triggered a push toward $0.073 level. In recent hours, the price of CFX is aiming for a hold around support channels. CFX price analysis 1-day chart: Conflux price faces bearish pressure Analyzing the daily Conflux price chart, CFX’s price faced a surge in selling pressure as the price dropped toward $0.073. CFX price is now aiming for a push below immediate Fib levels. The 24-hour volume has declined toward $1.11 million, showing a decline in interest in trading activity today. CFX price is currently trading at $0.073, declining over 0.33% in the last 24 hours. CFX/USDT Price Chart By TradingView The RSI-14 trend line has dropped from the previous level and trades below the midline at 47, hinting that selling pressure is rising. The SMA-14 level suggests volatility in the next few hours. CFX/USD 4-hour price chart: Bulls aim for an immediate correction The 4-hour Conflux price chart suggests that bears are strengthening their position to hold the price below the EMA lines. Currently, buyers are aiming for a correction after the recent downtrend. CFX/USDT Price Chart By TradingView The BoP indicator trades in a positive region at 0.6, showing that short-term buyers are taking a chance to accelerate an upward trend. However, the MACD trend line has formed red candles below the signal line, and the indicator aims for negative momentum, strengthening bearish-position holders’ confidence. Conflux technical indicators: Levels and action Daily simple moving average (SMA) Period Value Action SMA 3 $ 0.1215 SELL SMA 5 $ 0.1005 SELL SMA 10 $ 0.09221 SELL SMA 21 $ 0.09138 SELL SMA 50 $ 0.09580 SELL SMA 100 $ 0.1281 SELL SMA 200 $ 0.1298 SELL Daily exponential moving average (EMA) Period Value Action EMA 3 $ 0.08989 SELL EMA 5 $ 0.1000 SELL EMA 10 $ 0.1211 SELL EMA 21 $ 0.1451 SELL EMA 50 $ 0.1557 SELL EMA 100 $ 0.1431 SELL EMA 200 $ 0.1322 SELL What to expect from CFX price analysis next? The hourly price chart confirms that Conflux attempts to drop below the immediate support line; however, bulls are eyeing further recovery in the upcoming hours. If CFX’s price holds its momentum above $0.0792, it will fuel a bullish rally to $0.0863. CFX/USDT Price Chart By TradingView If bulls fail to initiate a surge, the CFX token price may drop below the immediate support line at $0.0688, which may begin a bearish trend to $0.0638. Is Conflux a good investment? As CFX price has a solid user base in the Chinese crypto community, we might see profitable returns in the long term. As a result, it can be a good investment option in the future. Why is the CFX price down today? Following significant accumulation, the selling demand surged for CFX. The sellers are now actively dominating the CFX price chart as it aims for $0.073. Will CFX Recover? If buyers hold the $0.1 level strongly, we might see buying demand above $0.15 in the CFX price chart. What is the expected value of Conflux in 2025? In 2025, CFX price might reach a maximum value of $0.4773. Will CFX price hit $1? According to our predictions, we might see the CFX price hitting the $1 mark by 2027. Will CFX price hit $5? Depending on the current market sentiment and buying demand, the $5 milestone for CFX price is a distant dream. However, we expect the coin to attain this value by the end of 2050. Recent news/opinion on Conflux Tether’s omnichain stablecoin USDT0 has surpassed $50 billion in cumulative transfers, with 20% of that volume occurring in November 2025, as activity expands across 15 networks including Conflux, Ethereum, and Solana. The milestone underscores growing demand for cross-chain liquidity via LayerZero’s OFT standard, though rising competition from Paxos’ newly launched USDG0 could influence how much of the momentum benefits networks like Conflux. Conflux Network price prediction December 2025 Conflux prices have been making moves as Bitcoin aims for a recovery. If BTC price holds above $100K in December, we might see a strong uptrend in CFX price. . Expert prediction for Conflux in December expects a minimum price of $0.07 and an average price of $0.12 with a maximum price of $0.15. Conflux Price Prediction Potential Low Potential Average Potential High Conflux Price Prediction December 2025 $0.07 $0.12 $0.15 Conflux Network Price Forecast 2025 Conflux is expanding globally and promoting NFT education in China, which could boost CFX demand. The Conflux Network, as the only blockchain in China meeting regulatory standards, is well-positioned to attract Chinese investors. Although there is no roadmap beyond 2030, past updates suggest it could emerge as a leading layer 1 blockchain in 2025. The CFX price in 2025 is expected to range between $0.05 and $0.4773, with an average of $0.4123. Conflux Price Prediction Potential Low ($) Potential Average ($) Potential High ($) Conflux Price Prediction 2025 0.05 0.4123 0.4773 Conflux Network Price Predictions 2026-2031 Year Minimum Price ($) Average Price ($) Maximum Price ($) 2026 0.6022 0.6228 0.6951 2027 0.8739 0.905 1.06 2028 1.22 1.25 1.51 2029 1.79 1.86 2.11 2030 2.57 2.64 3.08 2031 3.11 3.48 4.15 Conflux price forecast 2026 The team has prepared 2.4 billion CFX tokens as grant awards to encourage developers to broaden its network. With each token priced at $0.2, this amounts to nearly $600 million. The value could rise if the token price goes up. In a bullish scenario, by 2026, the price of Conflux is predicted to bottom out at $0.6022. The peak price could be as high as $0.6951, with an expected average price of $0.6228 throughout the year. Conflux price prediction 2027 The analysis for 2027 suggests that Conflux will have a minimum price of $0.8739. The price may escalate to a maximum of $1.06, averaging around $0.9050. Conflux price prediction 2028 The Conflux price is anticipated to reach a minimum of $1.22 in 2028, a maximum of $1.51, and an average of $1.25 throughout the year. Conflux price prediction 2029 Predictions for 2029 show Conflux reaching a minimum price of $1.79. The price could climb to a maximum of $2.11, with an average of $1.86 over the year. Conflux price prediction 2030 In 2030, Conflux could trade at a minimum of $2.57. The price is expected to peak at around $3.08, with the average trading price likely to be $2.64. Conflux price prediction 2031 Predictions for 2031 show Conflux reaching a minimum price of $3.11. The price could climb to a maximum of $4.15, with an average of $3.48 over the year. Conflux price prediction 2025 – 2031 Conflux market price prediction: Analysts’ CFX price forecast Firm Name 2025 2026 Gov.Capital $0.45 $0.66 DigitalCoinPrice $0.57 $0.78 Changelly $0.459 $0.54 Cryptopolitan’s Conflux (CFX) price prediction At Cryptopolitan, we are bullish on Conflux’s future price as the historical market sentiment is extremely impressive. The CFX price in 2025 is expected to range between $0.05 and $0.4773, with an average of $0.4123. However, the future market potential for Conflux entirely depends on its buying demand, regulation in China, and investor sentiment in long-term holding. We expect the CFX price to reach as high as $0.65 by the end of 2027. Conflux historic price sentiment Conflux price history | CoinStats Conflux launched at approximately $0.08 in late 2020 and reached an all-time high of $1.70 on March 27, 2021, during a crypto bull run. It dropped below $1.00 in May and ended the year at $0.1994. Conflux experienced significant losses, falling below $0.10 by mid-May 2022 and closing the year at $0.02198 after a nearly 90% annual decline. Starting the year 2023 at an all-time low of $0.02191, CFX rose above $0.30 in February following a partnership with China Telecom and peaked above $0.40 several times in March and April. It declined to $0.278 by June due to SEC lawsuits, dropped to $0.125 in August, and closed the year at $0.185. By January 2024, CFX increased to $0.2323 and surged above $0.51 in March before falling to $0.2. It consolidated around $0.22 in April and May, dropped to $0.13 in June, and oscillated between $0.11 and $0.25 from July to October, ending November near $0.2. In December, the price of CFX dropped toward the low of $0.15. Conflux began trading at $0.1561 in January 2025 and hovered between $0.144 and $0.15. However, CFX price declined in February, dropping below the crucial $0.1 mark. In March, the price of CFX dropped further as it recorded a low around $0.067. By the end of April, the price of CFX surged toward $0.086; however, it retraced later. In May, CFX strongly surged and hovered above $0.1. However, buyers failed to maintain the level, resulting in a drop toward $0.072 by the month’s end. By the end of June, CFX price surged toward $0.077. In July, CFX made a strong surge as it moved toward $0.28. In August, the price of CFX surged toward $0.21 but later declined toward $0.17 in early September. By the end of September, the price of CFX dropped toward $0.15. In October, the price of CFX declined toward $0.07. It maintained a bearish trend throughout November around $0.07.
BTC mining difficulty records last adjustment in 2025, forecast to rise in Jan
The rising Bitcoin network mining difficulty ensures the network remains sufficiently decentralized but also makes life harder for miners.
Did Saylor Just Signal Another Billion-Dollar Bitcoin Buy?
Bitcoin bull Michael Saylor is teasing yet another significant BTC purchase.
Canton CC Leads Crypto Gainers Amid Range-Bound Market, Eyes Upside
Canton (CC) led crypto weekly gainers with a 20% surge this week, followed by Zcash (ZEC) at 17% and DASH at 16%. Among losers, Pippin (PIPPIN) dropped 10%, with XDC Network (XDC) and MYX Finance (MYX) also declining amid resistance tests and leverage pressures. Canton [CC] rallied 20% with strong spot accumulation and bullish RSI, [...]
Hyperliquid wraps up the year with $844M in revenue, onboards more than 600k new users
Hyperliquid has marked the end of 2025 with $844 million in revenue from trading activities, alongside a total trading volume of $2.95 trillion. The decentralized exchange has also added more than 600,000 new users to its trading platform since January this year. Hyperliquid, a decentralized crypto exchange platform that operates on its own blockchain, has concluded the year boasting 600k new users and $844 million in revenue. The exchange recorded inflows worth $3.87 billion and achieved a total trading volume of $2.95 trillion. The DEX averaged about $8.34 billion per day and about $347.34 million every hour. Throughout the year, spot trading volume on the exchange reached $116.80 billion, while that of HIP-3 trading activities amounted to $11.01 billion. Hyperliquid’s perps generate $848.33m in trading fees 🚨 HYPERLIQUID ADDS 600K+ USERS IN 2025 According to ASXN Data, Hyperliquid added ~609,700 new users in 2025, hitting $2.95T in cumulative volume, $844M in revenue, $3.87B in net inflows, and $4.15B TVL. pic.twitter.com/h1UIAdacGR — Coin Bureau (@coinbureau) December 28, 2025 Data from Hyperscreener, a Hyperliquid data dashboard and analytics platform, shows that perpetual contracts generated the most fees, amounting to $848.33 million. Spot fees totaled $40.61 million while HLP transactions yielded $19.10 million in fees for the ecosystem. Perpetual contracts still led the platform’s revenue streams, bringing $808.54 million, while Spot contracts generated $35.25 million in total revenue the entire year. The exchange facilitated 198.9 billion transactions since January, with a daily average of 561.7 million transactions and 23.4 million transactions every hour. Perpetual contracts represented the majority of these transactions, accounting for $ 174.3 billion, while Spot contracts followed far behind with only $ 22.6 billion in transactions. HIP-3 transactions accounted for the least amount of executed orders, with only 1.9 billion transactions. Data from the analytics platform shows that Hyperliquid’s builder ecosystem peaked at 289.8k users with $46.27 million in revenue and 187 active builders. BasedApp ranked first among the top builders on Hyperliquid, with a volume of $35.18 billion and 35.4k users, followed by Phantom and PVP.Trade with volumes of $23.05 billion and $13.27 billion, respectively. Phantom ended the year with about 81.7k users while PvP.Trade had 19.5k users. Bitget claimed the tenth position with a volume of $2.53 billion and a little over 10k users. The data from Hyperscreener also highlighted that the DEX had introduced global equities such as Apple, Nvidia, Amazon, Google, and Tesla through its HIP-3 protocol. Nvidia was the most traded HIP-3 listing with $1.73 billion in trading volume. Tesla and Google followed with $1.15 billion and $1.04 billion, respectively. Bitcoin tops the list as the most-traded cryptocurrency on Hyperliquid Bitcoin was the most-traded digital asset on the platform, with a trading volume of $1.16 trillion. Ethereum and Solana trail behind with $824.61 billion and $269.94 billion in trading volume, respectively. According to data from CoinMarketCap, Hyperliquid’s native cryptocurrency, HYPE, is currently trading at $25.86. The digital asset is up by 7.64% in the last seven days and ranks 14th on CoinMarketCap’s list of the largest cryptocurrencies by market cap. The news comes after the DEX denied claims of insider trading on December 22 and urged that open short positions on HYPE originated from a former employee. The DEX also claimed that team members and current employees are banned from trading the DEX’s native token. Cryptopolitan reported that the alleged insider position was valued at $25,140 and involved the short sale of 1,000 HYPE shares. The report emphasized that the position was too small to have a significant impact on the market by introducing additional volatility. The report also highlighted that the insider owns 2.5 million HYPE in the spot market and has consistently held despite HYPE’s poor performance and the overall crypto meltdown. Get up to $30,050 in trading rewards when you join Bybit today
Ethereum Futures Hit $6.74T Record on Binance Amid Bearish Sentiment, Bitcoin Volatility
Ethereum futures trading volume on Binance reached $6.74 trillion in 2025, nearly doubling the 2024 record. This surge reflects strong investor interest and institutional participation amid rising bearish sentiment, with Bitcoin volatility signaling potential market corrections. Ethereum futures volume nearly doubled 2024’s record, indicating robust investor engagement and expanding institutional involvement in derivatives trading. Darkfost [...]
Hacker Who Stole Millions in Seconds Finally Caught
South Korea has successfully extradited a 29-year-old Lithuanian national accused of stealing approximately $1.8 million in digital assets through sophisticated malware. The National Office of Investigation (NOI) announced the extradition on Sunday, following a five-year investigation that spanned multiple countries. The suspect allegedly used malicious software to redirect cryptocurrency transactions from intended recipients to his own wallets. His operation targeted users across South Korea and several other nations between April 2020 and January 2023. Malware Disguised as Legitimate Software Authorities revealed the hacker distributed malware called KMSAuto, which masqueraded as a Microsoft Windows activation tool. The software attracted users seeking to bypass licensing requirements for the Windows operating system. Investigators determined the malware was downloaded over 2 million times globally. Once installed, it employed memory-hacking techniques to swap cryptocurrency wallet addresses during transactions automatically. The manipulation occurred in real-time, redirecting digital assets to the hacker's control without the victims' knowledge. The scheme specifically targeted individuals using unlicensed Windows activation tools. More than 3,100 cryptocurrency wallets worldwide fell victim to the infection. The hacker successfully intercepted 840 transactions, accumulating 1.7 billion won in stolen digital assets. Eight South Korean nationals lost a combined 16 million won to the operation. The investigation began in August 2020 when a victim reported losing one Bitcoin, valued at 12 million won at the time. The victim had sent the cryptocurrency to a known wallet address, only to discover it had been redirected elsewhere. International Cooperation Leads to Arrest Korean authorities traced the stolen assets through domestic exchanges to six different countries. The investigation expanded as seven additional Korean victims came forward with similar complaints. Police identified the suspect through extensive digital forensics and international collaboration. In December of the previous year, Korean authorities coordinated with Lithuania's Ministry of Justice, prosecutors, and police to execute a raid on the suspect's residence. Lithuanian officials seized 22 items during the operation, including multiple mobile phones, laptops, and other electronic devices. Korean police requested a red notice from Interpol to facilitate the suspect's eventual prosecution.
Cardano Creator Now Fights for XRP. Here’s What Happened
A rare and revealing confrontation on X has ignited fresh debate about who is truly building for the future of global finance. In an industry often defined by tribal rivalries, one of crypto’s most outspoken founders unexpectedly defended a long-time rival , drawing sharp reactions from institutional blockchain advocates and refocusing attention on utility over narrative. The exchange began after Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson criticized legacy finance initiatives attempting to replicate blockchain innovation within permissioned systems. His remarks quickly escalated into a public clash with Canton Network CEO Yuval Rooz, turning the discussion into a broader argument about scale, credibility, and readiness for the coming tokenization boom. Hoskinson Challenges Canton’s Vision Hoskinson aimed for Canton Network’s approach to real-world asset infrastructure, arguing that traditional finance is “reinventing” capabilities that already exist on public blockchains. JUST IN: #Cardano Co-Founder Charles Hoskinson Clashes With #Canton Network CEO Yuval Rooz Over $XRP already doing at a scale 100x beyond Canton ambitions. pic.twitter.com/mkZCZuYZCm — RippleXity (@RippleXity) December 27, 2025 He specifically highlighted the XRP Ledger and Cardano’s Midnight sidechain , asserting that both are already delivering financial settlement and privacy features at “100x” the scale of Canton’s ambitions. Framing the debate around the projected $10 trillion real-world asset market, Hoskinson emphasized that success in tokenization requires more than partial solutions. According to him, only fully integrated, end-to-end blockchain strategies backed by strong communities can meet global demands. His statement, “You can’t fake Cardano or XRP Nation,” stood out as an unusually direct endorsement of XRP from a historically competing ecosystem. RippleXity Brings the Exchange to Light As reported by RippleXity, the comments triggered an immediate response from Yuval Rooz, who dismissed Hoskinson’s claims and questioned Cardano’s real-world impact. We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1 — TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025 Rooz challenged Hoskinson to disclose decentralized exchange and DeFi volumes, suggesting that Cardano’s version of “Web3” has primarily benefited retail speculation rather than institutional adoption. RippleXity framed the exchange as a rare moment where a Cardano founder openly defended XRP’s technological maturity, underscoring how shifting market priorities are blurring old rivalries. Canton Network and the Institutional Divide Launched in 2024, Canton Network is a permissioned blockchain supported by major financial institutions such as Goldman Sachs and Deutsche Bank. Its goal is to enable interoperable tokenized assets within regulated environments. While this design appeals to banks, critics argue it sacrifices the openness and network effects that give public blockchains their global reach. Hoskinson’s critique reflects that tension, suggesting that institutional chains risk lagging by avoiding the very decentralization that enables scale and innovation. What the Clash Signals for Crypto’s Future Beyond the personalities involved, the dispute highlights a broader shift in crypto’s evolution. Hoskinson’s praise for XRP shows growing recognition that networks already moving value at scale, like XRP, may be better positioned for institutional finance than newly launched, closed systems. Hoskinson and Rooz’s clash illustrates a key question for crypto’s next phase: will tokenized finance be built on proven public rails like XRP, or on controlled replicas designed for legacy comfort, as the industry shifts from speculation to infrastructure? Disclaimer : This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are urged to do in-depth research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses. Follow us on Twitter , Facebook , Telegram , and Google News The post Cardano Creator Now Fights for XRP. Here’s What Happened appeared first on Times Tabloid .
Sberbank Issues First Crypto Backed Loan in Russia
Local media reports indicate that Sberbank, Russia’s largest banking institution, issued a loan to a local miner using cryptocurrency as collateral. While the transaction is just a pilot, it represents a first for the company and the country, marking an expansion in the use of these assets. Sberbank Registers First Loan Using Cryptocurrency as Collateral
Crypto market’s weekly winners and losers – CC, DASH, PIPPIN, MYX
This week put crypto’s “safe-haven” narrative to the test. Here’s how some of your favorite coins fared.
Coinbase Data Breach: First Arrest in Hyderabad as Former Customer Service Employee Tied to 69,461 User Records
Coinbase Data Breach: First Arrest in Hyderabad as Former Customer Service Employee Tied to 69,461 User Records
Is Dogecoin $1 Target 'Technically Feasible '?
Dogecoin continues to attract attention as it maintains trading levels above $0.12 during the current crypto market recovery. Recent technical analysis suggests the popular meme coin could experience significant price appreciation, with some analysts projecting a potential climb to $1 by 2026. The broader cryptocurrency market shows signs of strength, with total market capitalization reaching $2.97 trillion. At the time of writing, DOGE is trading at $0.1242, marking a 1.02% increase over the past 24 hours. The token faces immediate resistance at $0.13, with solid support established at the $0.12 level. Breaking through these technical barriers could determine the asset's short-term trajectory. DOGE’s price action over the past 24 Hours (Source: CoinCodex ) Technical Analysis Points to Bullish Momentum Multiple technical indicators suggest strengthening momentum for Dogecoin. The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) displays early signs of a bullish crossover, with the MACD line moving above the signal line. This configuration typically signals building upward pressure. The Relative Strength Index (RSI) currently sits at 44, below the neutral 50 threshold but trending upward. The indicator's movement away from oversold territory indicates increasing buying interest. These technical patterns mirror previous cycles where DOGE experienced substantial price appreciation. Source: TradingView Chart patterns reveal a price fractal similar to historical rallies that preceded major gains. The 4-hour chart shows consolidation between key levels, suggesting accumulation before a potential breakout. Market participants watch these technical formations closely for directional cues. Path to $1 Requires Sustained Market Support Reaching the $1 price target demands substantial market conditions and sustained demand. With a circulating supply of 168.08 billion tokens, Dogecoin requires significant capital inflows to support such valuation levels. The mathematical feasibility exists, but execution depends on multiple factors aligning favorably. The token's previous all-time high of $0.7376 in May 2021 demonstrates that ambitious price targets remain within reach. Historical performance shows DOGE can rally dramatically during periods of heightened retail participation and social media engagement. A broader crypto market recovery led by Bitcoin could trigger renewed interest in meme coins. Capital rotation from large-cap assets to high-beta altcoins often occurs during bull market phases. Dogecoin historically benefits from this dynamic, posting outsized gains when market sentiment turns decidedly positive. Institutional adoption could provide additional support. Potential inclusion in exchange-traded funds alongside Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana might drive fresh demand. Such developments would represent a significant milestone for a token originally created as a lighthearted cryptocurrency experiment. Open interest rose 1.68% to reach $1.51 billion, indicating traders are adding positions in anticipation of price movement. This metric suggests growing conviction among derivatives market participants. Source: Coinglass However, on-chain data presents a contrasting narrative. Crypto analyst Ali reported that major Dogecoin holders sold approximately 150 million tokens over a five-day period. This selling pressure from whale addresses represents a bearish signal that conflicts with rising retail optimism.
Ethereum Price Alert: CEX Long and Short Liquidation Intensities Jump at the $2900 and $3000 Levels
Ethereum Price Alert: CEX Long and Short Liquidation Intensities Jump at the $2900 and $3000 Levels